N&O Index Card Listings
Displaying 1-9 of 9 results.
Real Estate Development - Raleigh
- Builders see southeast Raleigh as prime area for development - Se 5 83 1
- Texas company (Harlon Group) finds Raleigh a good place to build apartments - Oc 25 83 1D
Real Estate Development - Raleigh
- Complex being built east of Beltline; Shops, homes, commerce park planned by Raleigh developer - Fe 11 87 6B
- Raleigh development subject of proposal - Ap 8 87 9A
- Swift Creek development limited - Jy 17 87 1
- Developer plans 570-acre park in East Raleigh - No 20 87 7D
Real Estate Development - Raleigh
- Fla. company to build complex in North Raleigh near Beltline (North/Beltline Center) - Ja 1 86 1
- Residents uniting against development in neighborhoods - Jn 23 86 1 - Japanese developers to build 1,000-unit Raleigh subdivision - Jy 23 86 1C
- Subdivision (Hedingham) to add offices and shops - Oc 28 86 1D
Real Estate Development - Raleigh
- Rural development limit placed along Outer Loop - Ja 16 85 1C
- Council endorses development policy for Falls Lake basin - Fe 22 85 1D
- Plan would allow development block from Executive Mansion - Mr 13 85 2C
Real Estate Development - Raleigh
- Shopping center zone sought (near Crabtree Valley Mall) - Mr 2 82 1C
Real Estate Development - Raleigh
- Planners back development on New Leesville Boulevard (Map) - Ja 12 89 2C
- Runoff ponds or fees urged for developers - Fe 1 89 1C
- Old Stone to take over 2 projects (Capital Center & Waverly Place) - Fe 9 89 5B
- Protection for Umstead Park focus of battle - Fe 14 89 1C
- Leesville Road rezoning backed by panel (Map) - Fe 16 89 1C
- Editorial: Protecting a Triangle treasure (Umstead State Park) - Fe 17 89 14A
- Officials struggle to preserve Umstead; Developers resist Raleigh plan to slow growth, create
- buffer zone for park - Fe 27 89 1
- Mangums make an upscale community of olde; Olde Raleigh had extravagant investment in site
- improvement - Mr 5 89 1F
- Cobey urges Raleigh City Council to limit growth near Umstead park - Mr 10 89 20C
- Lakeside building opposed (White Oak Lake; Map) - Mr 22 89 2C
- Land near Neuse, U.S. 1 backed for intense development zoning (Map) - Ap 13 89 1
- Making developers adapt to land called unworkable - Ap 27 89 1C
- Council waters down Umstead protections - Jn 21 89 1
- Editorial: At the mercy of a hard rain (Umstead state Park) - Jn 26 89 6A
- 2 Wake County towns fence for last big building frontier (Map) - Jy 6 89 1C
- Planning panel votes against Crabtree Creek subdivision (Map) - Oc 26 89 2C
- Updated plan for city backed; developers howl - No 10 89 1C
- Landowners fear city will take property (Maps) - No 16 89 1C
- Landowners seek exemption from Umstead buffer (Map) - De 5 89 1B
- Panel splits in backing subdivision - De 12 89 2B
- Eckerd project endorsed; But Five Points plan called ugly, ordinary - De 14 89 1B
- Prebuilt homes upset neighbors in Raleigh - De 14 89 1B
- Developers studied architectural history for Oakwood Green - De 31 89 1E
Real Estate Development - Raleigh
- Council approves plan for eastern gateway - Ja 16 91 2B
- Panel gives development on Neuse nod - Ja 29 91 2B
- Six Forks land annexation spawns debate - Fe 9 91 5B
- Raleigh council cast as friend of developers - Oc 1 91 1B
Real Estate Development - Raleigh
- Council approves subdivision on (Crabtree) creek - Ja 5 90 2B
- Complex off U.S. 70 late - Ja 7 90 1G
- Development nudges growth eastward - (Map) - Ja 21 90 1G
- Editorial: - Code not cast in concrete - Fe 17 90 14A
- U.S. 64 development limits proposed - Mr 14 90 2B
- Revised map puts N. Raleigh site on road to growth - Se 17 90 1B
- Council refuses to alter development plans - Se 19 90 5B
- Planners present U.S. 401 plan featuring 'compact development' - No 21 90 2B
- Panel amends U.S. 64 development proposal - No 28 90 2B
- Panel acts to limit development of U.S. 64 East - De 19 90 2B
