N&O Index Card Listings
Displaying 1-8 of 8 results.
Real Estate Development - Wake County
- Commercial developers requesting rezoning along proposed Outer Loop - Fe 26 85 1C
- Shell to buy 700 acres near RTP, plans to sell parcels to developers - Jy 24 85 1C
- Excavating, grading (for industrial park) temporarily halted after county protest - Oc 19 85 4C
- Development on Neuse OK'd by commissioners - Oc 22 85 1C
Real Estate Development - Wake County
- Golf course (in Falls Lake watershed) plan slowed; Homeowners voice opposition - Oc 14 92, 1B
Real Estate Development - Wake County
- Plan would guide growth near Umstead park, RDU - Jy 31 87 1
- Home building shifts to rural areas - Oc 27 87 1D
- Group wants more houses in watershed; Outer Loop land offered for OK on 67 more units - No 11 87 1
Real Estate Development - Wake County
- Skyrocketing Wake land values push farmers to development - Ja 13 86 8B
- Hotel-office complex planned near RDU - Ja 22 86 1
- State plans suit to stop development approved beside Umstead Park - My 8 86 1C
- Concerns grow over development near Umstead - My 26 86 1
- State files suit to block development near Umstead State Park - Jn 3 86 4C
- Firm plans $123 million project near RDU - Jy 18 86 5C
Real Estate Development - Wake County
- Small plots at Falls Lake surprise Wake planners - Jn 2 83 1
- Plan for Falls project presented to officials - Jn 4 83 3C
- New homes hinder highway plans - Jn 6 83 1C
- Board OKs moratorium on projects with sewage plants - Jy 7 83 2C
- Falls Lake dispute about development is urban vs. rural - Jy 11 83 1
- Falls Lake landowners' investments reap profits - Jy 24 83 1
- Perry Creek land-use plan OK'd - Au 3 83 4C
- Residential lake sites approved (Falls Lake basin) - Au 4 83 1
- Board OKs ninth subdivision in Falls watershed - Se 22 83 1
- Panel urges strictest limits in critical watershed areas - Se 23 83 1D
- Subdivision plan at Falls Lake endorsed - Oc 11 83 1C
- RTP neighbors protest plans to limit development further - Oc 29 83 1C
- Editorial: Falls Lake a political issue - No 7 83 4A
- Standards proposed for lake areas - No 29 83 1
- Level of watershed growth controls debated - De 1 83 1C
- Grimsley backs tight control for Falls, Jordan lakes areas - De 2 83 4D
- Irate property owners criticize strict development plan for I-40 - De 6 83 1
- Localities take up the burden of controlling lake development - De 26 83 1
Real Estate Development - Wake County
- Planned subdivisions in paths of roads (Map) - Ja 3 90 1B
- Wake attorney's office to review subdivision plans - Ja 4 90 2B
- Only written road plans can block proposed subdivisions, attorney says - Mr 8 90 6B
- Accords sought on development in Swift Creek basin (Map) - Mr 19 90 4B
- Subdivisions OK'd in path of bypass - Mr 22 90 2B
- Wake seeks to compel road paving; Staff is told to draft changes in rules governing developers - Ap 12 90 1F
- Developer asked to make room for Outer Loop - Ap 19 90 5B
- Wake planners approve 2 subdivisions - Ap 19 90 2B
- Outer Loop development list grows - My 5 90 2B
- Planning Board approves 2 projects (Little River Run & Bishopsgate subdivisions) - My 22 90 2B
- Wake delegation drops developers fee bill - Jn 6 90 3B
- Missing lot a puzzle to board (Map) - Jn 21 90 5B
- County targets scofflaws; Wake is searching for ways to buttress its subdivision law - Jy 19 90 1F
- U.S. 401 plans concern some Wake residents - Jy 20 90 5B
- Developers seeking sewer line to serve property near I-40 - Au 23 90 3B
- Changes in U.S. 64 plan prompt fears of more strip development - Se 15 90 1B
- Bulldozers may alter watershed; Landowner proposes changing lay of land - Se 26 90 1B
- City aims to stem erosion's upsurge with basin studies; Officials seek to limit impact of development - No 26 90 1B
Real Estate Development - Wake County
- Panel rejects subdivision plans in U.S. 64 bypass route - Ja 17 91 3B
- Rural property owners fighting proposed limits on development - Jn 6 91 3B
Real Estate Development - Wake County
- 1,300 homes planned near E. Raleigh; ... $200 million 'golfing community' set to be finished by
- '90 (Map) - Mr 7 89 1
- Early Wake settler's (Hunter-Trentman) house might fall in developers' path - Mr 23 89 3T
- Plan to guide development around Umstead park faulted - Jn 22 89 1C
- Planning board votes to maintain reservoir protection - Au 17 89 2C
- Plan for more building near reservoirs advances - Au 29 89 2C
- Vote delayed on reducing limits on development near reservoirs - Se 19 89 4C
- Community built around (Sunset) lake - Oc 15 89 1F
- Wake Planning Board advises keeping reservoir regulations - De 21 89 15B
