N&O Index Card Listings
Displaying 1-10 of 14 results.
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
- Actress in anti-Harris ad reports threatening calls - Jy 27 86 33A
- Southwestern Wake booming despite fears of Harris plant - Jy 28 86 1C
- Review of crisis plans requested - Jy 29 86 1C
- CASH seeks evacuation drill before Harris allowed to open - Au 8 86 24D
- Two oil spills at Harris plant being probed - Au 21 86 3C
- Durham Council seeks denial of N-plant exemption request - Se 3 2C
- NRC official sees no roadblocks for license to operate Harris plant - Se 10 86 18C
- Thornburg says CP and L should hold 2nd evacuation drill - Se 11 86 24C
- CP and L takes samples of lake's fish - Se 13 86 1C
- NRC chief tours Harris plant, promises safety - Se 16 86 20C
- Fuel loading at N-plant may begin in October - Se 19 86 1D
- Public Staff hires 2 firms to probe cost of N-plant - Se 24 86 22A
- Leaders urged to tell public about evacuation plan - Se 25 86 2C
- Adviser says Martin's authority in N-plant licensing limited - Se 26 86 8C
- N-plant moving closer to licensing, NRC says - Se 27 86 22A
- 300 CASH members rally at Capitol - Se 28 86 43A
- CASH says firings point to neglect - Oc 3 86 1D
- Martin refuses to halt N-plant licensing - Oc 5 86 39A
- CP and L asks U.S. agency to license Harris plant - Oc 9 86 2C
- Harris plant ruling might be delayed - Oc 10 86 22D
- Under the dome: State, CP and L co-sponsor Harris Media Day - Oc 13 86 1
- CP and L awaits NRC license allowing testing to begin - Oc 14 86 6B
- Editorial: Puffery not state's job - Oc 17 86 22A
- NRC staff endorses waiver of full drill to license N-plant - Oc 21 86 20C
- Harris plant licensed for testing - Oc 25 86 1
- Official urges evacuation drill for schools near Harris plant - Oc 28 86 1C
- Mock disaster at Harris plant tests county officials - Oc 29 86 11B
- Evaluators pleased with Harris drill - Oc 30 86 2C
- CASH seeks suspension of Harris plant construction permit - Oc 31 86 22D
- Harris license allows storage of spent fuel from 2 other N-plants - No 4 86 18C
- CASH has 'die-in' to protest Harris fuel loading - No 10 86 18C
- Fuel loading delayed at Harris plant - No 11 86 1C
- Upchurch proposes panel to monitor nuclear plant - No 13 86 1C
- Workers begin loading fuel into Harris N-plant reactor - No 18 86 1C
- Loading of fuel at N-plant halted after debris found - No 19 86 1C
- Harris plant fueling is delicate job - No 21 86 24A
- CP and L fuel loading at N-plant complete - No 22 86 10A
- NRC to decide on full power for Harris plant - De 9 86 18C
- Decision on full-power license for Shearon Harris plant put off - De 11 86 17B
- CP and L to disclose price increase on Harris plant - De 17 86 WA-1
- Action delayed on Harris plant advisory board - De 18 86 34A
- Cost estimates for N-plant rise by $191 million - De 18 86 15B
- Full license for N-plant soon may be considered - De 19 86 6D
- CP and L could gain millions if plant starts by 1st - De 30 86 1C
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
- Lawmakers get letter on nuclear waste bill - Jy 7 87 1C
- House accepts report on waste-burial bill - Jy 10 87 13A
- Waste debate heated - Jy 12 87 28A
- Bill to give counties money for taking wastes advances - Jy 16 87 17A
- Waste bill frowned on - Jy 19 87 27A
- Senate panel backs waste-facility bill - Jy 24 87 10A
- Counties with sites remaining in the state search for hazardous waste treatment plants - (Map) - Jy 31 87 1D
- Mavretic, Miller spar on funding for low-level waste facility - Jy 31 87 10A
- Wake, Durham still on toxic-waste plant list; Panel narrows selection to 16 locations in state - Jy 31 87 1D
- Waste plan may wait - Au 2 87 41A
- Flaherty finds fault with river-waste law - Au 4 87 7B
- Competing proposals made on nuclear waste site - Au 7 87 18A
- Compact repeal still supported - Au 9 87 29A
- Wake won't be site of hazardous waste plant - Au 14 87 1D
- Rockingham County fights waste facility - Se 1 87 4C
- Board votes to bill N.C. if Lincoln gets (hazardous waste treatment) plant - Se 2 87 2C
- N.C. counties fight selection for waste site - Se 3 87 26A
- Davidson site may lose spot on waste list - Se 9 87 4C
- Realty firm offers 2nd Durham site for hazardous waste plant - Se 10 87 1C
- Residents oppose Durham County sites for waste - Se 11 87 2D
- Enticing counties into taking waste plant gets nowhere - Se 12 87 4C
- N.C. waste site list cut from 15 to 13 - Se 18 87 1D
- Waste site to be picked by Oct. 1 - Se 24 87 20A
- Law gives Durham officials hope on waste site - Se 28 87 1C
- Residents' veto power urged for waste sites - Se 30 87 6C
- Several counties are emerging as leading waste-site choices - Oc 1 87 4C
- Waste site list cut to Rowan, Davidson - Oc 2 87 1D
- N.C. sites still on list for nuclear disposal; Burial place sought for high-level waste - Oc 3 87 1C
- Martin restates need to halt waste site search - Oc 6 87 13A
- Martin avoids taking position on bill authorizing nuclear waste way station - Oc 21 87 WA-1
- About 15,000 protest possible waste site (in Lexington) - Oc 27 87 3C
- Waste-site opposition expected, Martin says - Oc 28 87 3C
- Caldwell board votes to keep incinerator - No 3 87 3C
- EPA decision pleases Davidson, Rowan residents - No 12 87 2C
- Martin might call for session; Legislature would deal only with hazardous waste - No 12 87 1C
- Hunt for site of waste plant begins again - No 17 87 1C
- Waste panel looks at Piedmont sites - No 18 87 2C
- N.C., Ga. differ on methods for finding hazardous waste site - No 22 87 31A
- Poor areas won't get waste-site search preference - No 25 87 16C
- Editorial: Site search: no wasted effort - No 28 87 10A
- Legislative panel hears debate on safety of waste sites - De 4 87 20C
- Tentative waste-site rules backed - De 9 87 16C
- Waste site near N-plant not ruled out - De 11 87 4C
- Over $3 million may be needed for waste plant - De 18 87 1C
- Search for nuclear waste site continues, with N.C. off list - De 21 87 2C
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
- Evacuation plan debated as Harris start-up nears - Jn 8 86 1
- Chapel Hill council opposes licensing of nuclear plant - Jn 10 86 1C
- CP and L warns delay may last 6 months - Jn 11 86 1
- Smith defends plant safety, emergency plans - Jn 11 86 9A
- Municipal power agency favors nuclear plant - Jn 12 86 4C
- 1,400 attend CP and L hearing on nuclear plant - Jn 13 86 1
- SBI watches groups opposing start-up of nuclear plant - Jn 13 86 18A
- CASH stages balloon protest near Harris - Jn 15 86 26A
- CP and L, Shearon Harris foes disagree on viability of alternatives to N-plant - Jn 15 86 1
- Questions raised about plant costs - Jn 15 86 26A
- Editorial: Wrong place for SBI (at Shearon Harris) - Jn 16 86 10A
- (Hillsborough) Board OKs Harris-plant resolutions - Jn 17 86 1C
- 4 former governors endorse start-up of Harris N-plant - Jn 17 86 1
- CASH resolutions OK'd in Orange - Jn 18 86 1C
- Chatham board to reconsider N-plant plan - Jn 18 86 2C
- (Raleigh) City Council backs establishing plan for evacuation during N-plant accident - Jn 19 86 24A
- Activists lead CASH to forefront in effort to stop Harris N-plant - Jn 19 86 12B
- Thornburg asks CP and L to give more emergency radios - Jn 20 86 5B
- Debate over safety of Shearon Harris broadcast live on TV - Jn 21 86 WA-1
- Harris start-up delay may raise some rates - Jn 26 86 7B
- Merchants support Harris plant - Jn 28 86 1C
- CP and L chief says Harris foes hold sway - Jn 29 86 24A
- Swedish citizens oppose opening of Harris plant - Jn 29 86 27A
- Wake commissioners back opening of Harris, reaffirm emergency plan - Jy 1 86 1C
- CP and L urges its workers to push for nuclear plant start-up - Jy 2 86 4C
- Foes of Harris plant seek delay on low-power-testing license - Jy 3 86 4C
- Harris plant likely to receive license for low-power testing, official says - Jy 3 86 1C
- Chatham commissioners vote to rejoin, expand Harris plant evacuation plan - Jy 8 86 1
- Lee County official says evacuation plan might be improved - Jy 9 86 1C
- Editorial: Back on Harris bandwagon - Jy 11 86 22A
- Update existing city plans for evacuation, panel says - Jy 11 86 1D
- Harris foes denied request to delay N-plant licensing - Jy 12 86 1C
- Harris backers, foes debate nuclear safety on radio show - Jy 13 86 36A
- Full operation of Harris N-plant won't begin until '86, CP and L says - Jy 15 86 1C
- Revision sought on evacuation plan resolution - Jy 22 86 4C
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
- 6 arrested in nuclear plant drug probe - Ja 11 85 1
- More face drug charges at Shearon Harris plant - Ja 12 85 2C
- Group wants assessment of drug use at Shearon Harris - Ja 23 85 14C
- Grand jury indicts six workers at Harris plant on drug counts - Ja 30 85 3C
- Nuclear board to hear contention of drug use - Mr 16 85 20C
- N-plant design process cleared despite 91 deficiencies - My 4 85 2C
- N-plant's mock disaster tests preparedness - My 19 85 29A
- Shearon Harris test a success, officials report - My 20 85 1C
- Drivers could evacuate students in nuclear emergency, expert says - Jn 25 85 4C
- Thornburg role in CP and L drug hearings OK'd - Au 7 85 9A
- CP and L criticizes SBI allegations in drug probe at nuclear plant - Au 17 85 1C
- Board rejects allegations that Harris plant is unsafe - Au 24 85 4C
- U.S. sets hearing on drug use at CP and L plant - Se 17 85 16C
- Drug use not widespread, CP and L probe told - Oc 1 85 4C
- N.C. utilities head asks for Shearon Harris audit - Oc 1 85 1C
- Editorial: CP and L merits fair audit - Oc 2 85 20A
- Witness challenges report of drug use - Oc 2 85 WA-1
- CP and L to reinspect N-plant generators - Oc 3 85 20C
- Deputy tells regulators drug activity widespread at Harris nuclear plant - Oc 4 85 1D
- CP and L says delay likely in Harris start-up - Oc 9 85 18C
- Official says most Harris plant design problems solved - Oc 17 85 20C
- CP and L consultant urges strengthening of warning rules - No 5 85 16C
- Board to hear arguments on CP and L plan - No 7 85 20A
- N-plant work correct, consultant for CP and L says - No 13 85 16C
- Public Staff repeats call for Harris plant audit - No 15 85 4C
- Tale of two nuclear plants - controversial and costly - No 24 85 1D
- Public Staff asked to probe Harris plant construction - De 10 85 12A
- Editorial: CP and L case needs audit - De 16 85 14A
- Regulators reject allegations involving Shearon Harris plant - De 17 85 16C
- CP and L says it will begin operation of Shearon Harris plant in late '86 - De 19 85 1C
- Federal board says N-plant sirens may not be totally effective at night - De 20 85 1D
- N.C. seeks reinspection of Harris plant - De 21 85 1C
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
- CP and L say reinspections (of Shearon Harris) would be costly, unneeded - Ja 8 86 16C
- Harris site may be used to store fuel from 2 plants - Ja 18 86 1C
- Officials differ on warning system for Harris N-plant - Ja 25 86 1C
- Federal energy official praises plans for notification at Shearon Harris - Mr 6 86 5C
- Neighbors of N-plant express uneasiness - Mr 10 86 1C
- Group begins campaign to stop opening of Shearon Harris plant - Ap 15 86 8B
- Residents form group to oppose opening of Shearon Harris plant - Ap 20 86 36A
- Shearon Harris gets 1st load of uranium fuel - Ap 25 86 19A
- Board clears way for CP and L N-plant - Ap 26 86 1
- One-man protest against CP and L plant likely to continue (Eddleman) - Ap 28 86 5A
- Shearon Harris nearing start-up; foes still at work - Ap 28 86 4A
- License endorsed for CP and L N-plant - Ap 30 86 1C
- Public Staff opposes one-time charge to pay for Shearon Harris N-plant - My 17 86 1C
- Durham council OKs resolution against N-plant - My 20 86 2C
- Residents express N-plant concerns - My 21 86 2C
- Chairman defends Harris N-plant - My 22 86 1
- Wake residents say county needs evacuation plan for nuclear disaster - My 22 86 1C
- Editorial: Emergency plans flawed - My 23 86 24A
- Evacuation plan rejection urged - My 23 86 4D
- N-plant foes increase effort to halt start-up - My 27 86 1C
- Chatham board votes to quit emergency plan for N-plant - My 28 86 1
- Resolutions opposing N-plant sought in Chapel Hill, Carrboro - My 28 86 5A
- CP and L warns delay could cost $2 million daily - My 29 86 1
- Wake officials still support evacuation plan - My 29 86 7A
- Candidates say they oppose Harris plant - My 30 86 5A
- Council urged to get Raleigh in CP and L evacuation plan - My 30 86 4A
- Martin says he's 'comfortable' with start-up of Shearon Harris - My 30 86 1
- Safety board questions nuclear plant warning systems - My 30 86 4A
- Sanford supports Chatham pullout (to handle Shearon Harris emergency) - My 30 86 1D
- Editorial: Safe or sorry at Harris - My 31 86 20A
- Group pushing N-plant issue in Orange race - Jn 2 86 4C
- Pump fails at Harris plant in test of emergency system - Jn 3 86 1C
- Opponents of Harris plant urge action to delay licensing - Jn 4 86 5C
- Martin sings two tunes on nuclear issues - Jn 6 86 16A
- Methodists oppose N-plant opening - Jn 6 86 1D
- Opponents tell Raleigh residents Harris plant not safe - Jn 6 86 22D
- Price urges delay in N-plant opening pending Raleigh plan - Jn 6 86 3D
- CP and L, federal agencies laud plant's safety - Jn 8 86 31A
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
- Delays to be sought in N-plant licensing - Ja 8 87 20C
- Harris gets approval from NRC - Ja 9 87 1
- Full license for N-plant still pending - Ja 10 87 9A
- Harris plant issued full-power license - Ja 13 87 1
- Harris N-plant shut down; 'Routine' problems in cooling system cited - Ja 14 87 1
- Harris plant remains idle; repairs tested - Ja 15 87 20C
- CP and L argues committee (to monitor Shearon Harris) needs technical knowledge - Ja 16 87 4D
- Editorial: Scrutiny for Harris plant - Ja 16 87 14A
- Harris plant produces power from nuclear fuel - Ja 20 87 2C
- Appeals court to issue ruling on Harris plant evacuation plan - Fe 6 87 6C
- Court denies plea to close Harris plant - Fe 10 87 1C
- CASH says study assails drug use during Harris plant construction - Fe 19 87 5C
- Disaster exercise at Harris plant will test evacuation plan - Fe 24 87 18C
- CP and L finds violation at N-plant, but NRC undecided on penalty - Fe 26 87 11B
- CASH (Coalition for Alternatives to Shearon Harris) will monitor radiation at Harris plant - Fe 27 87 7C
- N.C. officials approved Harris emergency plan - Fe 27 87 19A
- Panel to monitor N-plant operations - Fe 27 87 22D
- State hopes drill eases crisis fears; Harris plant test ominous to some - Fe 28 87 1C
- Light turnout marks N-plant disaster drill - Mr 1 87 31A
- Full power at Harris plant expected by end of the month - Ap 1 87 4C
- Commercial operation expected for N-plant - Ap 17 87 2D
- Harris plant marks milestone by reaching 100 percent power - Ap 22 87 WA-1
- Harris plant status upgraded - My 3 87 33A
- Full operating license upheld for Shearon Harris N-plant - Au 14 87 24D
- Officials faced with justifying plant's expense - Se 11 87 13A
- Shearon Harris practice drills not tough enough, NRC finds - Oc 1 87 16C
- Shearon Harris plant given B+ by committee - Oc 31 87 2C
- Audit says Harris plant mistakes cost $297 million - De 22 87 1
- CP and L says one-time drop of $1.80 per share possible - De 22 87 1D
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
- CP and L seeks anti-pollution exemption - Ap 1 83 1D
- CP and L boosts cost for Harris plant - Ap 7 83 1
- NRC supports federal OK for Shearon N-plant - My 24 83 1C
- Shareholder asks NRC to halt Harris N-plant - Jy 1 83 16D
- CP and L says Harris' power to cost most - Au 24 83 1
- Group wants N-plant permit revoked - No 4 83 14D
- CP and L likely to scrap Unit 2 reactor at Shearon Harris plant, experts say - No 22 83 1D
- License urged for Harris N-plant - No 30 83 1C
- CP and L cancels Shearon Harris unit - De 22 83 1
- Highlights of Shearon Harris plant history - De 22 83 21A
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
- Harris unit won't reach completion, NRC says - Mr 14 82 27A
- Harris plant's impact reduced, official says - Ap 8 82 12C
- CP and L workers to move to Wake plant - My 9 82 36A
- Harris N-plant may store spent fuel - My 9 82 35A
- Report cites N-plant accidents' potential - No 2 82 1
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
- NRC chairman blasts shirking on atomic waste - Mr 14 92, 8C
- Harris plant begins its sixth year; CP and L reckons it will recoup costs - My 5 92, 1D
- Petition urges shutdown of at least 6 reactors (including Shearon Harris) - Au 14 92, 6C
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
- Wake board tentatively OKs bonds for CP and L nuclear waste treatment - My 1 84 14C
- Shearon Harris accident evacuation plan to be reviewed - My 3 84 11A
- CP and L shareholders told nuclear unit helps outlook - My 17 84 20A
- References to 'monks,' 'devils' spice hearing on Harris license - Jn 15 84 1D
- N-plant foes say emissions imperil health - Jn 19 84 6A
- Foes to argue against license for CP and L's Harris plant - Se 4 84 16C
- Improvements show utility can operate Harris, CP and L says - Se 6 84 20A
- CP and L chided for using tank to store water - Se 8 84 8A
- Harris plant delay likely, CP and L says - Se 11 84 16C
- Harris inspections called adequate - Oc 17 84 4C
- CP and L says plant delayed 6 months - Oc 25 84 1C
- Shearon Harris plant expected to cause CP and L rate increase - De 11 84 8B
- Projected cost of Harris plant up to $300 billion, CP and L says - De 20 84 1C
