N&O Index Card Listings
Displaying 1-10 of 10 results.
Trade Waste - Disposal
- Groups want to protect development-threatened water (OUTSTANDING RESOURCE
- WATERS) - Ja 5 88 3C
- RED TIDE forces delay of bay scallop season - Ja 9 88 2C
- Neuse to get tight limits on discharge; Cities must enhance wastewater handling - Ja 29 88 1C
- Tiny fleas test the waters for contamination - Fe 22 88 1C
- Waste-hungry bacteria wait for dinner gong - Mr 10 88 18T
Trade Waste - Disposal
- More haste promised in finding and fining N.C. water polluters - Ja 4 90 1B
- Pollard may face water-pollution fine - Ja 16 90 1B
- Firm (Salem Coatings) won't be fined for dumping residue (in Peters Creek) - Ja 17 90 4B
- Sewage dumping halt urged; Groups seeking action against Rocky Mount (Map) - Fe 14 90 1
- Fecal bacteria count from river still high (Broad Creek) - Fe 22 90 4B
- Study finds high toxic metal levels in Neuse - Mr 1 90 1
- Heavy metals level in Neuse could be threat to humans - Mr 2 90 4B
- Little pollution found around state's marinas - Mr 3 90 4B
- Paper companies ask state to ease control on dioxin discharges - Mr 9 90 4B
- Water-quality panel discusses pollutants threatening coast - Mr 31 90 4B
- Editorial: Cultivating clean water - Ap 12 90 20A
- EPA may expand tests for toxic chemicals (in groundwater at hazardous waste sites) - Jn 5 90 4B
- Construction blamed for 2 muddied rivers - Jy 21 90 4B
- Group finds high bacteria levels in Neuse, Pamlico - Au 1 90 4B
- Receptacles for boaters' waste scarce on coast - Au 28 90 4B
- Fluoride spills into tributary of Falls Lake - Se 7 90 2B
- Warning urged on fish in 3 rivers with dioxin (Neuse; Roanoke; Chowan) - Se 8 90 4B
- Electric motors help in pollution battle - Se 9 90 14B
- Fishermen decry dioxin warnings - Oc 2 90 1B
- Growth is polluting Catawba River - Oc 8 90 5B
- Tar Heel editors speak: How green is North Carolina? - Oc 14 90 7J
- Plants polluting Neuse basin, activists charge - Oc 19 90 1B
- Substance in Neuse still unidentified - De 22 90 3B
- 2 men reportedly dump chemicals into Tar - De 25 90 4B
- Fear of tainted wells brings annexations; EPA undertakes an assessment of contamination - De 27 90 2F
- Pesticide dumping reported in Granville - De 28 90 4B
Trade Waste - Disposal
- Mill (Weyerhaeuser) spill threatens N.C. river (Roanoke; Map) - Jy 20 89 1
- No damage found yet from waste spill near Roanoke River - Jy 21 89 WA-1
- Expert (Dorney) says rules bar large waste discharges (in Lumber River) - Jy 30 89 29A
- Activists say 15 firms need tighter controls on dumping waste - Oc 7 89 13A
Trade Waste - Disposal
- Researcher finds 5 toxic Pamlico 'hot spots' - Ja 22 89 20A
- Technology to clean mill water exists but comes with drawbacks - Ja 27 89 1
- Plant (Carolina Byproducts) pays states' fines to clean up dead fish (Crowders Creek) - Fe 2 89 2C
- Dioxin tests ordered in some N.C. rivers - Fe 3 89 3C
- EMC panel backs delaying stricter toxic water limits - Fe 9 89 14C
- Currituck seeks delay in opening of (Va. flood control) canal - Fe 11 89 14A
- Absences running high in Cumberland school (gastrointestinal illnesses) - Fe 15 89 2C
- Firm to study Shiloh contamination - Mr 17 89 4C
- Sierra Club study says area growth threatens drinking water, recreation - Mr 17 89 1C
- Pigeon River tests don't yield cause of fish ills - Mr 25 89 3D
- We all have hand in coastal mess - Mr 26 89 7D
- Rainfall forces state to halt shellfishing - Ap 13 89 2C
- Company extends water lines; More Shiloh residents receive bottled water - My 10 89 1C
- Environmental panel to consider regulation of more pollutants - My 11 89 27A
- Pollution forces closing of shellfishing waters - My 19 89 2C
- Dead menhaden littering (Pamlico River) shores; cause of FISH KILL under study - Jn 1 89 3C
- Plan to cut pollution gets backing (and classifying Tar-Pamlico River system as nutrient sensitive) - Jn 16 89 4C
- More wells found contaminated in Shiloh; experts are surprised (Map) - Jn 21 89 1C
- Water reported tainted under High Point dump - Jy 8 89 2C
- Shiloh residents sue firm (Beazer Materials and Services) over water pollution - Jy 9 89 25A
- Poultry processing firm (House of Raeford) defends water efforts - Jy 12 89 2C
- Agency approves stricter standards aimed at curbing water pollution - Jy 14 89 2C
- Mill (Weyerhaeuser) spill threatens N.C. river (Roanoke; Map) - Jy 20 89 1
- Requests for lead tests flood Raleigh agency - Jy 20 89 24A
- Gastonia bottler takes steps to protect drinks - Jy 28 89 2C
- Expert (Dorney) says rules bar large waste discharges (in Lumber River) - Jy 30 89 29A
- Textile-dye component gives Tar River white tint - Au 1 89 3C
- Lax enforcement of pollution laws cited - Au 8 89 16C
- Top 500 polluters ranked; Environmental report lists 11 N.C. firms (Chart) - Au 11 89 24C
- Springs, wells near tree farms not tainted - Au 31 89 2C
- Groundwater contamination in Eastern North Carolina (Map) - Se 13 89 2C
- Wake sites listed as polluters - Se 13 89 1C
- Pulp-mill overflow kills fish in creek; Spill is Weyerhaeuser's 2nd in 2 months (Map) - Se 19 89 3C
- Carcinogens may go undetected in small towns' water supplies - Oc 2 89 1C
- Activists say 15 firms need tighter controls on dumping waste - Oc 7 89 13A
- Excessive amounts of chemical found in 13 water supplies - Oc 21 89 3C
Trade Waste - Disposal
- Revised permit would limit Texasgulf discharges further - Mr 4 88 15A
- Firms criticize waste plant plan; Canadian company requests permit to build incinerator in Halifax - No 22 88 WA-1
Trade Waste - Disposal
- Ashland official (Gravett) denies Greensboro acid spills - Ja 10 88 27A
- Toxic waste treatment site may be selected next month - Ja 16 88 5C
- Lack of hazardous waste site called bad for N.C. business - Ja 22 88 3C
- Senate panel defends state's waste disposal program - Ja 29 88 3C
- Challenge to N.C. law shaky, EPA experts say (placement of treatment plants) - Ja 30 88 5D
- Tar Heel Editors Speak: Toxic dumps everyone's concern - Fe 7 88 7D
- Lack of hazardous-waste disposal sites key public works problem, Martin says - Fe 26 88 6D
- EPA may clean up Lejeune site - Mr 5 88 12A
- Crews remove smoldering hazardous-waste truck - Mr 6 88 49A
- Editorial: Scared by hazardous waste? - Ap 28 88 10A
- Incinerator suit settled in Caldwell - Ap 28 88 2C
- Lures are called key to placing waste site - Ma 10 88 8B
- Edgecombe plans hearing on accepting waste site - Ma 12 88 16C
- Lee site studied for facility - Ma 12 88 1
- Edgecombe long studied for radioactive waste site - Ma 13 88 1C
- Lee commissioners oppose waste site - Ma 18 88 10B
- Chatham, Lee unite to oppose proposed waste treatment site - Ma 19 88 1C
- Edgecombe officials propose waste disposal 'park' (WASTE MANAGEMENT PARK, NC) - Ma 19 88 1
- EPA official backs state in dispute over waste rules - Ma 19 88 1C
- Despite plan, Lee site hasn't been ruled out - Ma 20 88 4A
- N.C. reportedly has won battle over waste law - Ma 21 88 9A
- Lee officially made a waste site candidate; Panel waiting for formal Edgecombe proposal - Ma 27 88 1C
- Tar Heel editors speak: Don't waste example set by Georgia - Ma 29 88 7D
- Experts debate design options for waste sites; Edgecombe plan prompts concerns on most suitable
- choice for state - Jn 1 88 8A
- Possibility of continuing to ship out waste considered - Jn 2 88 3C
- Mavretic maneuvers about-face on waste - Jn 5 88 27A
Trade Waste - Disposal
- Activist says spill hurt Falls Lake (Organon Teknika) - My 21 91 2B
- Seafood industry seeks new ways to dispose of wastes - Oc 3 91 4B
Trade Waste - Disposal
- Firm (Salem Coatings) won't be fined for dumping residue (in Peters Creek) - Ja 17 90 4B
- Scientists wary of Va. meat firm (Smithfield) moving to N.C. - Fe 6 90 4B
- Underground wastewater line ruptures; Creek (Little Contentnea) thought to be safe from spill - Ap 28 90 4B
- Processsors seek deregulated waste; General Assembly will consider bill backed by poultry companies - My 6 90 4C
- Group seeks halt to sludge disposal on Robeson land - No 14 90 4B
- Industries face uncertainty about wastes - De 14 90 17A
