N&O Index Card Listings
Displaying 1-10 of 10 results.
Water Quality
- Cities may need change to meet water standard - Ap 7 83 2C
- State starts upgrade of standards for water in Falls, Jordan lakes - My 13 83 1D
- Falls water quality concerns planners - My 26 83 1C
- Uniform standards urged for lake water - Au 10 83 1
- Hearing participants back strict water ratings at lakes - Au 11 83 2C
- Grimsley to unveil water quality plan Friday for two lakes - Oc 5 83 14C
- Lakes declared 'nutrient-sensitive'; strict rules on water quality likely - Oc 14 83 1
- Editorial: Water quality at stake - De 5 83 4A
Water Quality
- Coastal board creates panels on erosion, water quality - Ja 28 84 8B
- Falls Lake water effort called one of nation's best - Fe 6 84 7A
- Jordan Lake deemed 'acceptable' (water quality) - Mr 9 84 2D
- Panel supports ban on phosphates to improve water quality in lakes - Ap 13 84 1D
- Board endorses water-quality plan for Falls, Jordan - Ap 26 84 15A
- Industry, environmentalists address water proposals - Jn 29 84 20D
- Sanford says planned development won't harm Raleigh's water quality - Jy 12 84 12B
- Industry study urges lower standards for Cape Fear River - Au 12 84 32A
- Water quality improvement ureged - Oc 9 84 1C
Water Quality
- Editorial: Warning aloft on the lakes - Mr 2 87 12A
- Water quality reclassified in New Hanover sound - Ap 10 87 8B
- Editorial: Water challenges remain - My 1 87 20A
- EPA may ease water rules for plant (Champion) - My 13 87 18C
- N.C. water to be checked for chemical risks - Jy 12 87 30A
- Upchurch vows to fight for regional water plan - De 5 87 2C
- Water study advises checks on pesticides - De 25 87 1C
Water Quality
- Editorial: Water quality needs clout - Fe 15 86 16A
- N.C. marina policies targeting changes caused by boating boom - Jn 8 86 42A
- Under the dome: Lawmaker (Hudson) denies conflict of interest - Jy 4 86 1
- Surcharge for tests on water considered - No 11 86 4C
- Panel approves (coastal) water-quality recommendations - No 20 86 31A
- Water quality panel seeks new methods (for classifying coastal waters) - De 3 86 WA-1
Water Quality
- Water quality of (Jordan) lake questioned - Jy 4 82 25A
- Satellite will judge N. C. water quality in experiment today - Se 24 82 7B
Water Quality
- Water quality rules at fork; State panel set for critical vote - Fe 12 92 1B
- Editorial: Fateful day for drinking water - Fe 13 92 12A
- Exploring options to ensure water quality - Mr 9 92 9A
- Currituck bass spawning endangered by salinity - No 22 92 13B
Water Quality
- (Transylvania) Board votes for delay of water designation - Ja 24 90 4B
- Editorial: Gardner, the hen house fox - Ja 28 90 6J
- Environmental concerns spark Gardner to seek vote reversal - Fe 3 90 3B
- Gardner apologizes for stand on clean-water veto - Fe 9 90 3B
- Alarka Creek receives 'high quality water' tag - Ap 14 90 4B
- State adds to limits on runoff; Development backers fears called unfounded - My 11 90 1
- (Raleigh) Water's tint not a cause for alarm - Jy 13 90 2B
- Editorial: A floor for cleaner water - De 19 90 16A
- Streams in N.C. cleaner; Dramatic drop seen in phosphate levels - De 20 90 1
Water Quality
- Speakers debate water-quality rules - Au 16 91 1B
- State (drinking water) standards apply to one quarter of state - Au 25 91 2C
- Shrimp, crab catches reflect water quality - Se 3 91 5B
- Water rules plan attacked; State proposal would hurt Garner, panel told - Oc 1 91 1B
Water Quality
- Some water systems don't report bacteria, health official says - Fe 20 85 4C
- Jordan Lake study a political issue, speakers say - My 16 85 16A
- Durham to protect water sources - My 29 85 2C
- Water quality regulations backed - Se 19 85 2C
- Editorial: A start on water quality - De 1 85 18A
