N&O Index Card Listings
Displaying 11-14 of 14 results.
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
- CP&L improves Harris plant ratings - Fe 13 90 3B
- Harris plant closed for valve repair - My 22 90 8A
- CP&L panel reach charge pact - Jy 11 90 6C
- CP&L rates to go up again; Increase is third and last to finance Shearon Harris nuclear plant - Au 2 90 5B
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
- CP&L facing NRC fine - Jy 25 91 1B
- CP&L plant rates high in reviews - Jy 27 91 6C
- CP&L pays its fine; Violations cited at Harris plant - Se 19 91 6C
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
- Shearon Harris lands named urban sanctuary - Ja 22 88 24C
- Snowstorm stirs old fears for area near nuclear plant - Ja 24 88 29A
- Thornburg cites overruns of $856 million at (Shearon Harris) N-plant - Fe 23 88 1C
- Consumers at hearing respond to Harris plant costs - Ap 5 88 1C
- A lesson in nuclear plant trivia - Ap 10 88 37A
- Inquiry will test CP&L decisions on Harris plant - Ap 10 88 29A
- CP&L officials will defend handling of nuclear plant building at hearing - Ap 14 88 5B
- No radiation increase found near N-plant - Ap 14 88 5B
- CP&L officials defend expense of Harris plant - Ap 15 88 1C
- Studies for CP&L in '75 looked at consequences of canceling 2 reactors - Ap 16 88 12A
- Audit cites good, bad of Harris project - Ma 19 88 1C
- CP&L chief sees steady growth - Ma 19 88 7B
- Engineers, CP&L dispute impact of delay on N-plant - Ma 20 88 24C
- Engineers cite CP&L for not cutting Harris - Ma 21 88 1C
- N-plant engineering hours questioned - Ma 25 88 18C
- Audit reviews prudence of CP&L officials - Ma 31 88 1C
- CP&L responds to accusations of mishandling N-plant building - Jn 1 88 18C
- CP&L pays $4.6 million to argue case - Jn 2 88 1C
- Editorial: Harris costs in spotlight - Jn 2 88 18A
- CP&L officials reluctant to claim N-plant design - Jn 4 88 3C
- CP&L didn't foresee canceling reactors, company official says - Jn 7 88 1C
- Consultant for CP&L (Reinsch) says 'turn lights off'; Rate-hike plan to cover N-plant cost
- defended - Jn 11 88 1
- N-plant redesign called time-consuming - Jn 15 88 WA-1
- CP&L says power plant shut down for refueling - Au 2 88 2C
- Shearon Harris overruns called unavoidable - Au 7 88 27A
- Editorial: Harris bill comes due - Au 9 88 8A
- Harris plant is rated high on safety - Se 28 88 18C
- Harris plant water leak no danger, officials say - De 2 88 22C
- Nuclear waste may be shipped to Harris plant - De 9 88 1C
- Security lapses at Shearon Harris result in fine - De 30 88 1C
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
- Short circuit shuts N-plant - Mr 15 89 3C
- Reactor restarted after mishap - Mr 16 89 16C
- Emergency evacuation zone (Map) - Ap 13 89 4T
- Fears lessen over Harris plant - Ap 13 89 1T
- CP&L suit claims defects in Harris plant equipment - My 2 89 1
- The urban image: Shearon Harris and the machine aesthetic - Se 10 89 3E
- Fire shuts Harris N-plant - Oc 11 89 1
- Cost of Harris fire to consumers not clear - Oc 12 89 17A
- Harris plant fire cause confirmed - Oc 19 89 14C
- CP&L puts cost of Harris plant fire at $2 million - Oc 24 89 16C
- Nuclear-reactor builders plan for revival - No 27 89 2A