N&O Index Card Listings

Displaying 11-20 of 21 results.
Shore Protection
  • Big seawalls not solution, panel says - Jy 20 84 3D
  • Panel recommends bond to enforce beach liability - Se 21 84 29A
Shore Protection
  • Hunt seeks federal aid in oversight along coast - Mr 2 83 2C
  • Cost cutting sought in coastal programs - Mr 16 83 4C
  • Coastal management - Mr 18 83 4D
  • Official warns against bulkheads - Oc 6 83 2C
  • Sandbag plan is tabled by coastal board panel - No 18 83 5B
Shore Protection
  • N. C. shoreline receding 2 feet a year, state study indicates - Mr 16 83 2C
  • Coastal management - Mr 18 83 4D
  • Editorial: Beach buyers beware - Ap 15 83 4A
  • Here's what is being done about coastal growth - Jy 17 83 7D
Shore Protection
  • Proposal would boost acreage with U.S. protection on coast - Mr 25 87 9B
  • Editorial: Fewer castles on the sand - Ap 2 87 16A
  • Environmental group should stay aggressive, official says - Jn 22 87 8B
  • N.C. buys golf course to use as Outer Banks sand trap (Jockey's Ridge) - Jy 9 87 22C
  • Developers, environmentalists disagree on water runoff plan - Au 21 87 WA-1
  • Editorial: - No compromise on the coast - Au 24 87 8A
  • Editorial: A treasure slipping away - Se 13 87 6D
  • Editorial: Martin misses signals on coast - Se 28 87 16A
Shore Protection
  • Reagan signs law authorizing 5 N.C. water projects - No 19 86 12B
  • Sierra Club seeks protection of coastal dunes - No 19 86 12B
Shore Protection
  • State agency rejects FORT FISHER seawall bid - Ap 8 92, 5B
  • State panel denies TOPSAIL BEACH bid to build seawall - Jy 24 92, 5B
  • Panel hears pleas to change state seawall rules - No 20 92, 5B
  • Group formed to protect coastal land (NC Coastal Land Trust) - De 19 92, 7B
Shore Protection
  • Editorial: - Tying down the sand - Ja 3 90 10A
  • Fort Fisher status may bar seawall - Ja 31 90 4B
  • States, federal government fighting over coastal rules - Ja 31 90 3B
  • Off-road vehicles jam beaches; Impact on ecology, safety worry conservationists - Ap 22 90 1
Shore Protection
  • Expert says new bill would undermine protection of rights to coastal waters - My 23 85 27A
  • Audubon funds coastal series by Duke Press - Jy 28 85 37A
  • Coastal development guidelines published - Au 22 85 21A
Shore Protection
  • Editorial: - Costs along the coast - Ap 10 88 6D
  • Movie planned for FORT FISHER has citizens' group crying 'Cut!' - Au 4 88 1C
  • Better protection from storms needed along coast, panel told - Oc 1 88 11A
Shore Protection
  • Panel may rethink ban on beach-hardening structures (SHORE PROTECTION) - Fe 2 91 4B
  • Topsail Beach still pushing for anti-erosion groin - Mr 20 91 4B
  • Coastal panel delays vote on easing structure rules (seawalls, etc.) - Mr 22 91 1B
  • Long Beach might try 'dewatering' process - Mr 26 91 4B
  • Battle launched to save Civil War FORT (FISHER) from sea - Mr 28 91 1B
  • Tar Heel editors speak: Trojan horse for Topsail Beach - Mr 31 91 7J
  • CRC chief seeks to soften seawall ban - Jn 14 91 3B
  • Editorial: Time, tide and Mr. Harrington - Jn 17 91 6A
  • State's strict seawall ban is finding favor elsewhere - Jy 22 91 5A
  • Editorial: Hold fast on the coast - Jy 24 91 10A
  • Panel keeps seawall ban; Proposal to ease tough state regulation is dropped - Jy 27 91 1
  • Fort may skirt ban on seawalls - Jy 31 91 5B
  • Editorial: Commission, and ocean, say no - Au 1 91 10A
  • Tar Heel editors speak: Long Beach is too poor to help - Se 8 91 7J
  • Law will limit drivers on N. Topsail Beach - Se 21 91 5B
  • Coastal officials seek aid; New storm poses threat to dunes - No 8 91 5B