N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Hazardous Waste Sites

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Meeting set for comments on landfill - Ja 1 86 18C
2. Treatment plant could meet state's needs, plan says - Ja 3 86 1D
3. Panel voices concern on radioactive dump site search - Ja 4 86 2C
4. Cobey opposes studying rock body for waste site (Rolesville pluton) - Ja 7 86 4C
5. Groups voice concerns about proposed landfill - Ja 10 86 3D
6. N.C. sites not suitable for waste, Martin says - Ja 16 86 12B
7. Possibility of nuclear waste facility creates fear, anger among residents - Ja 17 86 10A
8. Two N.C. sites to be considered for nuclear waste storage facility - Ja 17 86 1
9. Data for waste-site selection questioned - Ja 18 86 1C
10. Harris site may be used to store fuel from 2 plants - Ja 18 86 1C
11. Official criticizes plan for low-level waste landfill - Ja 18 86 22C
12. Editorial: Concern yes, panic no - Ja 22 86 10A
13. Waste-site plans assailed at Bladen hearing - Ja 22 86 1C
14. Digging begins at chemical-warfare dump in N.C. (Buncombe Co.) - Ja 26 86 34A
15. Questions, answers on waste site; Huge underground complex would hold radioactive byproducts - Ja 26 86 29A
16. State provides plan for operating facility for low-level waste - Ja 28 86 18C
17. Western N.C. urged to gear up for long fight against waste dump - Ja 30 86 22C
18. Hendon bill would take N.C. off list of waste sites - Fe 1 86 4C
19. Issue of nuclear waste site near Raleigh won't go away on its own, official says - Fe 1 86 1
20. Madison official trying to fight waste site - Fe 1 86 9B
21. Referendum urged on waste-burial site - Fe 6 86 2C
22. Referendum on radioactive burial site likely to be placed before voters May 6 - Fe 8 86 3C
23. Waste-site selection worrying mountain residents - Fe 9 86 37A
24. Editorial: Time to bury referendum - Fe 11 86 12A
25. Professor urges giving towns voice about waste sites - Fe 12 86 16C
26. SCLC leader decries plans for waste sites - Fe 13 86 5C
27. State hires man to lead fight against waste sites - Fe 13 86 5C
28. Official says briefings on waste site poorly publicized - Fe 17 86 4C
29. Federal officials seek to calm fears about waste site selection process - Fe 18 86 1C
30. Legislature OKs referendum on nuclear waste site - Fe 19 86 8A
31. Panel won't try to find site for hazardous-waste landfill - Fe 20 86 2C
32. Scotland picked for GSX plant because it is poor, critic says - Fe 20 86 20A
33. Some say advisory vote on waste site could set bad precedent on other issues - Fe 20 86 1C
34. Lawmakers didn't intend for panel to seek site for landfill, Nesbitt says - Fe 22 86 4C
35. Editorial: Referendum (on nuclear waste site) sets bad precedent - Fe 24 86 10A
36. Speakers oppose waste repository - Fe 28 86 20D
37. Draft report calls North Carolina most suitable for low-level waste site - Mr 1 86 1
38. Rock 'fold' may aid argument against N.C. waste site - Mr 4 86 1C
39. Opponents of waste dump gather - Mr 12 86 1C

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.