N&O Index Card Listings

Displaying 1-3 of 3 results.
Advertising, Outdoor
  • Billboards not listed for property taxes In counties checked by N&O (Chart) - Ja 22 89 14A
  • Many billboard companies escape property tax in N.C. - Ja 22 89 1
  • DOT fails to get disputed signs removed - Ja 23 89 6A
  • DOT rarely revokes permits for damaged, worn-out signs - Ja 23 89 5A
  • Transportation department lax on billboard regulation - Ja 23 89 1
  • Tree-cutting rule at DOT contradicts General Assembly - Ja 23 89 5A
  • Cities brace for new legislative battle over billboards - Ja 24 89 1
  • City official, industry unsure whether signs will be taken down - Ja 24 89 5A
  • Compensation bill was worth millions to industry - Ja 24 89 5A
  • Editorial: Invisible billboards - Ja 25 89 8A
Advertising, Outdoor
  • Billboard rules approved; Request by Martin sets back industry - Ja 5 90 1
  • Editorial: Modest gains on billboards - Ja 8 90 6A
  • 'Drug Free' campaign grows - Fe 1 90 3B
  • Lawyers debate timing of suit filed over billboard ordinance - Fe 28 90 5B
  • Tree removal (to aid billboard viewing) halted after residents protest - Ap 26 90 4B
  • Signs show up on I-40; Road a new market for billboard firms - My 24 90 6C
  • Federal agency barring clearing for billboards - Jn 13 90 1B
  • Editorial: Good sign for the trees - Jn 18 90 6A
  • Tar Heel editors speak: Cut billboards, not trees - Jn 24 90 7J
  • State denies billboard firms permits to cut public trees - Jy 6 90 3B
  • Billboard debate pits government against business - Au 6 90 3B
  • Tar Heel editors speak: A school board is suckered - Au 26 90 7J
  • Sign companies covet I-40; Billboard issue sparks debate along rustic route - Au 30 90 1
  • Editorial: Good signs Down East - Se 1 90 14A
  • Tougher rules are proposed on billboards - Se 6 90 1B
  • Billboard rule proposal already facing questions - Se 7 90 3B
  • Tree-cutting ban may end; Billboard companies may be allowed to cut in front of signs - De 6 90 3B
Advertising, Outdoor
  • State orders rule review on billboards - Ja 25 89 1
  • Revenue secretary to review taxation policy for billboards - Ja 26 89 1C
  • Official (Powers) delays tax decision on billboards - Fe 3 89 6D
  • Towns preserve vanishing vistas; Some scenic entries cluttered beyond help, but others can be
  • saved - Fe 9 89 1T
  • DOT finds 500 illegal billboards; N.C. probe uncovers signs without permits - Fe 10 89 1
  • Records show official (Hutchens) let illegal sign stand - Fe 11 89 1C
  • Billboard ordinance proposed - Fe 22 89 2C
  • Task force targets sign loopholes, plans public hearing - Mr 3 89 24C
  • New look at billboard-law challenge sought - Mr 30 89 3D
  • State calls for billboard tax increase - Mr 30 89 1
  • Zoning-lapse fines of $100 a day urged - Mr 30 89 1C
  • Sign firm's complaint solvable, attorney says - Mr 31 89 2C
  • DOT finds some government signs illegal - Ap 1 89 2C
  • Foes prepare for billboard hearing; Industry, environmentalists to speak - Ap 12 89 4C
  • Environmentalists, local officials request stricter billboard rules - Ap 13 89 3C
  • Billboard moratorium, review of state regulations proposed - Ap 15 89 15A
  • Editorial: Time-out on billboards - Ap 19 89 14A
  • Billboard panel backs illegal-cutting penalty - Ap 25 89 18C
  • Raleigh law on billboards is challenged - Ap 28 89 1C
  • Panel recommends limits on billboards - My 2 89 1C
  • Editorial: Bad signs for billboards - My 4 89 14A
  • Billboard values (Chart) - My 12 89 11A
  • Firms say signs worth more than tax value - My 12 89 1
  • House OKs bill to change billboard law - My 12 89 11A
  • Editorial: Billboard firms want it all - My 14 89 6D
  • Raleigh wins round on signs; Federal magistrate advises against reopening challenge of law - My 26 89 22C
  • Billboard proposals coming up; Panel to recommend sharp new limits - My 30 89 1
  • Sign company (NAEGELE) pursuing suit halts contracts - Jn 17 89 1C
  • Mavretic vote blocks weaker billboard fees - Jn 25 89 21A
  • Editorial: Bad sign on billboards - Jn 27 89 10A
  • House tentatively backs billboard-fee hike - Jn 28 89 18C
  • House approves lower hikes in billboard fees - Jn 29 89 19A
  • Bill to hike billboard fees advances - Jy 14 89 8A
  • Senate panel to debate lottery bill (and other actions) - Jy 25 89 5A
  • 300 illegal signs taken down; But lost records, other delays allow some longtime violators to
  • stand - Se 1 89 1
  • Panel rejects tougher controls on billboards - Se 1 89 4A
  • Editorial: Keep heat on billboards - Se 5 89 10A
  • Firm loses bid to reopen suit on billboards - Se 16 89 2C
  • Panel denies key proposals to boost billboard law - Oc 2 89 1C
  • Editorial: Retreat on billboards - Oc 3 89 10A
  • Harrington defends transportation panel over billboard rules - Oc 7 89 4C
  • Editorial: Harrington's bad signs - Oc 12 89 18A
  • Billboard regulation endorsed; Proposals aim to halt illegal tree cutting - Oc 13 89 1
  • New tax formula on billboards swells local government coffers - Oc 21 89 1
  • Panel rejects sign ban on new rural roads - No 3 89 4C
  • Billboard proposals advance; Panel OKs eased rural restrictions - De 1 89 1B
  • Editorial: A failure on billboards - De 2 89 14A
  • (Henderson County) Billboard ordinance is upheld by court (also Dunbar Corp. and Bamberger
  • cases) - De 20 89 4B