N&O Index Card Listings

Displaying 1-10 of 13 results.
Falls Lake
  • Board approves permit for store with fuel pumps, tanks near lake - Ja 5 84 1C
  • Block seeks temporary ban on watershed development - Ja 6 84 1
  • Planning board chief sets Falls Lake priority - Ja 6 84 2D
  • Summers says gas station at Falls calls land-use rules into question - Ja 6 84 6B
  • Editorial: Gasoline, water don't mix - Ja 9 84 4A
  • Wide-ranging ideas for Falls Lake focus on need to provide an example - Ja 10 84 4C
  • Editorial: Fooling around at Falls Lake - Ja 23 84 4A
  • More lake area safeguards urged - Ja 24 84 1C
  • Plan to halt Falls Lake pollution advances to Wake Planning Board - Ja 26 84 1C
  • Upchurch asks aid to protect Falls - Ja 28 84 1C
  • Editorial: Awakening to Falls Lake - Ja 30 84 4A
  • Changes in zoning for Falls endorsed - Fe 2 84 1C
  • State denies city's request to help draft Falls bill - Fe 3 84 4B
  • Falls Lake water effort called one of nation's best - Fe 6 84 7A
  • Editorial: Timid steps for Falls Lake - Fe 9 84 4A
  • State is urged to define Falls 'critical area' - Fe 10 84 3D
  • Planners favor extending Falls limits - Fe 16 84 1C
  • Wake planners settle on wording of proposed controls for Falls - Fe 23 84 2C
  • Citizens' committee urges strict zoning in Falls basin - Fe 29 84 2C
  • Water weed threatens vital lakes, study says - Mr 20 84 4C
  • NRCD secretary lauds panel's plan to protect lakes - Mr 23 84 1D
  • Editorial: Minimum lake protection - Mr 27 84 4A
  • Falls Lake's area smaller than corps' 1st estimate - Ap 6 84 1D
  • Panel recommends strict development plan for Falls Lake - Ap 11 84 1C
  • Mayor worried lake shortfall puts water supply in jeopardy - Ap 14 84 1C
  • Triangle J Council reiterates steps to control lakes' pollution - Ap 20 84 2D
  • Editorial: A grievous Falls error - Ap 24 84 4A
  • Board endorses water-quality plan for Falls, Jordan - Ap 26 84 15A
  • Two facilities at Falls to be opened late - Ap 26 84 1C
  • Judge rejects suit to block gas station near Falls Lake - My 5 84 20C
Falls Lake
  • Some Falls Lake launches delayed - Ap 12 83 1C
  • Falls Lake results let leaders glow in pride - My 1 83 1
  • Many visitors are expected at Falls Lake - My 1 83 25A
  • Editorial: Falls Lake: a foul future? - My 3 83 4A
  • Editorial: Fallout at Falls Lake - My 7 83 4A
  • Sewage, runoff pose dilemma in Falls Lake area - My 10 83 1C
  • State hasn't reclassified two lakes for swimming (Jordan and Falls) - My 11 83 1C
  • Editorial: Endangering the lakes - My 13 83 4A
  • State starts upgrade of standards for water in Falls, Jordan lakes - My 13 83 1D
  • Board to study water supply for wells near Falls Lake - My 19 83 2C
  • Editorial; Folly at Falls Lake - My 19 83 4A
  • United planning effort sought for watershed of Falls Lake - My 19 83 4C
  • Formulation urged of lake growth plan - My 20 83 3D
  • Board approves measure for Wake to monitor Falls, Jordan watersheds - My 21 83 1C
  • Upgraded lake classification urged - My 25 83 1C
  • Wake planners broaden study of (Falls Lake) watershed - My 25 83 1C
  • Falls water quality concerns planners - My 26 83 1C
  • Va. Reservoir offers lesson about protecting Falls Lake - My 29 83 1
  • Editorial: Speak up for Falls Lake - My 31 83 4A
  • Plan for Falls project presented to officials - Jn 4 83 3C
  • Upchurch urges Wake officials to protect lake - Jn 4 83 9A
  • Editorial: En route to Folly Lake - Jn 6 83 4A
  • House OKs bill funding work for dam, lake - Jn 8 83 4C
  • Required buffers studied in Falls watershed - Jn 8 83 1C
  • Strictest standards for lakes studied - Jn 9 83 1
  • Permit ban is imposed at 2 lakes - Jn 10 83 1
  • Watershed controls may hike bills - Jn 10 83 1D
  • Planners ask new water rating for Falls, Jordan lakes - Jn 14 83 1C
  • 'Pulse' blooms of algae found in Jordan, Falls - Jn 16 83 4C
  • More algae found in Jordan, Falls - Jn 18 83 1C
  • Editorial: Lake protection vital - Jn 22 83 4A
  • Public recreation areas at Falls Lake open today - Jn 25 83 5C
  • Durham top source of Falls watershed phosphorus levels - Jy 8 83 1D
  • Editorial: Timidity on Falls Lake - Jy 10 83 4D
  • Hearing planned on Lakes' standards - Jy 12 83 12C
  • Expert warns against overreaction to algae test - Au 1 83 1C
  • Editorial: High Falls Lake risk (subdivisions in watershed) - Au 5 83 4A
  • Guidelines urged to check pollution control system - Au 6 83 4C
  • Hearing participants back strict water ratings at lakes - Au 11 83 2C
  • Editorial: Toward clean lakes... - Au 13 83 4A
  • Counties agree state must lead in Falls controls - Au 31 83 1
  • Editorial: Larger lake role for state - Se 2 83 4A
  • Upstream cities grumble over Jordan, Falls cleanup - Se 2 83 5D
Falls Lake
  • City Council votes to intervene in hydroelectric plant project - Fe 6 85 1C
  • Council endorses development policy for Falls Lake basin - Fe 22 85 1D
  • Study shows Falls Lake's water is OK for drinking - Jn 8 85 1C
  • Protection affirmed for 2 area lakes (Falls; Jordan) - Jy 12 85 1D
  • Tests show Falls Lake water safe but concerns linger about future - Jy 14 85 24A
  • Treyburn called no threat to Falls Lake - Au 18 85 33A
  • Lead from gas-powered boats called no threat to Falls Lake - Au 31 85 3C
  • Regional standards urged for Falls Lake protection - No 7 85 3C
Falls Lake
  • Corps to begin filling Falls Lake - Ja 12 83 1C
  • Corps starts filling rest of Falls Lake - Ja 14 83 1D
  • Falls Lake brings promise, problems - Ja 16 83 1D
Falls Lake
  • Officials study enlarging Falls Lake - My 14 84 1
  • Council votes 8-0 for Falls Lake rules - My 16 84 1C
  • Corps official optimistic on Falls Lake benefits - My 17 84 1
  • Editorial: Falls Lake unfathomed - My 17 84 4A
  • Planners protect watershed, reservoir - My 17 84 2C
  • Commissioners committee urges park at Falls Lake - My 30 84 1
  • Corps puts its stamp on facilities at (Falls and Jordan) lakes - My 31 84 3C
  • Scale of Falls Lake maps wrong, corps engineer says - Jn 29 84 7B
  • Speakers differ on council's policy for development in Falls Lake
  • basin - Au 8 84 1C
  • Panel debates Falls Lake area development restrictions - Se 14 84 2D
  • Confusion idles recreation area on Falls Lake - Se 25 84 1
  • Corp officials expect OK on raising Falls water level - Oc 14 84 29A
  • Editorial: Critical time for Falls Lake - Oc 15 84 4A
Falls Lake
  • Panel awaits state action on lake woes - Se 8 83 20A
  • Upchurch urges state to set up Falls board - Se 13 83 4C
  • Editorial: Erosion imperils lakes - Se 27 83 4A
  • Grimsley to unveil water quality plan Friday for two lakes - Oc 5 83 14C
  • Grimsley suggests watershed controls - Oc 8 83 1
  • Lakes declared 'nutrient-sensitive'; strict rules on water quality likely - Oc 14 83 1
  • Editorial: Toward quality lakes - Oc 19 83 4A
  • Neighbors of Falls Lake protest planned sewage treatment plan - Oc 21 83 1D
  • Editorial: Falls Lake a political issue - No 7 83 4A
  • Standards proposed for lake areas - No 29 83 1
  • Grimsley backs tight control for Falls, Jordan lakes areas - De 2 83 4D
  • Editorial: Water quality at stake - De 5 83 4A
  • Localities take up the burden of controlling lake development - De 26 83 1
  • Editorial: Shortsighted on Falls Lake - De 31 83 4A
Falls Lake
  • Raleigh thirst, growth collide - Ja 5 92, 1
  • the plight of Falls Lake; As more and more people flock to the water; officials face tough decisions on development - Ja 5 92, 1
  • Threats to Falls Lake - Ja 5 92, 1
  • Editorial: Controls for a clean lake - Ja 7 92, 6A
  • State agrees Falls Lake study is flawed - Ap 29 92, 3B
  • Bill to boost level of Falls Lake OK'd - Jn 20 92, 1
  • Commissioners put off decision on size of lake - Au 13 92, 3B
  • Development may be further curbed; City county consider expanding special zone around Falls Lake - Au 29 92, 6B
  • Editorial: Out of bounds at Falls Lake - Se 18 92, 12A
  • Board OKs changes in Falls Lake maps; Move will expand shore by 7 miles - Se 29 92, 1
  • Here's the tab for fun at Falls; Corps to bill state $27 million - plus - No 13 92, 1
  • Falls Lake called sound investment - No 14 92, 4B
  • What Falls Lake offers - (Chart) - No 14 92, 4B
Falls Lake
  • Raleigh, federal officials to re-evaluate Falls Lake - Jn 28 86 10B
Falls Lake
  • Reagan requests $10.3 million for (Falls Lake) dam project - Fe 9 82 1C
  • Two Falls Lake recreation sites slated to be open next summer - Au 26 82 1C
  • Jordan, Falls Lake funding not affected by new (water conservation) policy - Se 5 82 27A
Falls Lake
  • Strict sewage limits recommended to help clean up Falls, Jordan lakes - Fe 27 87 1
  • Editorial: Warning aloft on the lakes - Mr 2 87 12A
  • Panel will study anti-pollution bill - My 14 87 21A
  • Editorial: Sharing Falls Lake - Au 22 87 16A
  • Wake mayors endorse bill for Falls Lake study - Se 23 87 2C