N&O Index Card Listings

Displaying 1-10 of 11 results.
Jetties
  • Dare officials back inlet commission - Jn 28 86 WA-1
  • Senator drops plan for inlet jetties - Jy 16 86 2C
  • Martin, Helms, Broyhill discuss Oregon jetty with OMB chief - Au 6 86 4C
Jetties
  • Dare seeks state funds for inlet jetty lobbying - Au 5 83 4D
  • Editorial: Dredging up a lobbyist - Au 6 83 4A
  • State allocates funds to press for jetties - Au 25 83 3C
  • Editorial: Shallow case for the jetties - Se 8 83 4A
  • Bill to build jetties clears first hurdle - Se 21 83 2C
  • Jones links jetties, opponents' bills - Se 23 83 8B
  • 3 congressmen back Oregon Inlet jetties - Oc 24 83 1C
  • Senate panel to consider Oregon Inlet jetties bill - No 2 83 4C
  • Congressmen oppose Oregon Inlet jetties - No 29 83 4C
  • Obstacles threaten construction of stone jetties at Oregon inlet - De 5 83 8A
  • Some funds for Oregon jetties lost - De 6 83 2C
  • Group applauds jetty opponents - De 11 83 37A
  • Hunt raps Corps of Engineers, leaves staffers puzzled - De 17 83 1C
Jetties
  • Editorial: Inlet jetties too risky, costly - Ap 19 83 4A
  • N. C. coalition formed to push for jetties - Ap 22 83 13A
  • Editorial: Watt right about inlet - Ap 26 83 4A
  • Delays strand Oregon Inlet plan for jetties - Jn 9 83 2C
  • Dare OKs funds for jetties effort - Jy 26 83 2C
  • Jetties supporters to ask Hunt for lobbying funds - Au 4 83 4C
Jetties
  • Interior secretary backs Oregon Inlet jetties - Mr 18 92, 8B
  • Jones ponders next move to start work on Oregon Inlet jetties - Mr 20 92, 5B
  • Tar Heel editors speak: Jetties studied enough...But critical questions remain - Mr 29 92, 5G
  • Editorial: Holding back the jetty set - Ap 1 92, 8A
  • Editorial: Holding back the jetty set - Ap 6 92, 8A
  • Jetty bill is stripped of delaying provision - Jy 24 92, 5B
  • Coastal panel to hear public on seawalls - Se 25 92, 5B
  • N.C. jetties expected to get OK; Conditional approval likely from Lujan - Oc 6 92, 1
  • Jetty project still faces hurdles - Oc 7 92, 2B
  • Jetties receive conditional nod; Lujan leaves refuge, seashore questions on Oregon Inlet table - Oc 30 92, 5B
  • Approval of jetties contested; Environmentalists file federal suit - No 3 92, 5B
  • Proposal on ban on jetties mulled; Plan would make two exemptions (Fort Fisher; Oregon Inlet) - De 14 92, 2B
  • Coastal panel OKs Fort Fisher seawall; Variances also cover Dare jetties - De 15 92, 1
Jetties
  • Jetty planning goes on - Au 21 82 7B
Jetties
  • Lawmaker questions necessity of report for Oregon jetty plan - Fe 8 84 11A
  • Jetties bill headed for full House committee meeting - Fe 25 84 1C
  • Jones gains victory for inlet jetties as panel rejects attempt to
  • block bill - Mr 1 84 1
  • Editorial: Jetties on shifting sand - Mr 3 84 4A
  • Holden Beach wants jetties built - Mr 3 84 2C
  • (Folly) Inlet jetties deemed unjustifiable - Mr 27 84 2C
  • Oregon Inlet: Congressional candidates differ on jetties - Ap 29 84 5D
  • Study disputes (Oregon) inlet's role in 8 deaths - Jy 2 84 1C
  • Jetties 'sound economic investment,' corps of engineers asserts in
  • report - Au 7 84 5C
  • Jetties may save 27 lives in 50 years, corps says - Au 8 84 3C
  • Editorial: Skepticism on jetties abides - Au 13 84 4A
  • Debate opens on Oregon Inlet jetty proposal in House - Se 20 84 17A
  • House approves jetties proposal for Oregon Inlet after hot debate - Se 21 84 4D
  • Editorial: Tossing money at tides - Oc 1 84 4A
  • Bill for jetties at Oregon inlet remains bogged down in Senate - Oc 10 84 1C
  • Adjournment rush kills jetties - Oc 13 84 18C
  • Coastal committee suggests restricting sea walls, jetties - No 16 84 18D
Jetties
  • Panel schedules hearings on jetties - Ja 18 84 2C
  • Concerns may stall jetty bill for inlet - Ja 28 84 2C
  • Jetty opponents drown out pro-fishing comment - Ja 31 84 1
  • Decision on jetties may wait months - Fe 3 84 6B
  • Senators argue for jetties - Fe 7 84 2C
Jetties
  • Review of Oregon Inlet study sought - Ja 24 87 5C
  • Dare board OKs changes (name and size of Dare Co. Oregon Inlet and Waterways Commission) - Fe 5 87 4C
  • Drive renewed to build Oregon Inlet jetties - Jn 24 87 2c
  • Inlet jetties get negative review - De 18 87 8D
  • Editorial: Another 'No' for jetties - De 21 87 14A
Jetties
  • Watt proposes more coastal barrier areas - Au 17 82 1C
Jetties
  • Panel may rethink ban on beach-hardening structures - Fe 2 91 4B
  • Oregon Inlet jetty plan clears funding hurdle - Fe 6 91 4B
  • Court faults state panel (Coastal Resources Commission) for OK of Bonner jetty - Ap 3 91 4B
  • While shielding beach, new jetty hooking anglers - My 4 91 1B
  • CRC chief seeks to soften seawall ban - Jn 14 91 3B
  • Oregon Inlet jetty hooks anglers, but state wants area off-limits - Jn 27 91 1B
  • State's strict seawall ban is finding favor elsewhere - Jy 22 91 5A
  • Success of jetties unpredictable, scientists tell coastal commission - Jy 26 91 4B
  • Editorial: Commission, and ocean, say no - Au 1 91 10A