N&O Index Card Listings

Displaying 1-10 of 11 results.
Occupational Safety and Health
  • >
  • State responds to federal inspection takeover - Jn 9 92, 4B
  • Talks under way on 2 job safety bills - Jn 10 92, 4B
  • Safety bills' vote may face delay - Jn 16 92, 4B
  • House OKs safety bills; Supporters cite Hamlet fire toll - Jn 18 92, 1B
  • Labor program reprieved; Proposals in wake of Hamlet blaze satisfy regulators - Jn 19 92, 1
  • Editorial: Labor reform unfinished - Jn 22 92, 6A
  • Safety bill passes House; Whistle-blowers would get shield - Jn 24 92, 1
  • Workplace safety proposals (Chart) - Jn 24 92, 4A
  • Editorial: Worker safety: no joy yet - Jn 25 92, 10A
  • House to pass most of safety package - Jn 27 92, 4B
  • House backs safety fines; Government agencies could face first penalties - Jn 30 92, 4B
  • Senate committee unwraps workplace safety bill package - Jy 1 92, 4B
  • Senate panel OKs 4 workplace safety bills - Jy 3 92, 4B
  • Senate passes 2 workplace safety bills - Jy 7 92, 4B
  • 2 worker safety bills advance - Jy 8 92, 4B
  • State inspections rare for some industries; Construction sites main focus of safety effort - Jy 8 92, 6B
  • Senate panel eases safety fines for cities - Jy 9 92, 4B
  • House OKs workplace inspections - Jy 10 92, 8B
  • Editorial: New spotlight on hazards - Jy 15 92, 6A
  • House enacts bill to create workplace safety programs - Jy 15 92, 4B
  • Agencies probe death of suspect (Riggs); Employer may have violated labor laws - Jy 16 92, 3B
  • House rejects Senate workplace measures - Jy 17 92, 4B
  • Safety rules finally pass - Jy 24 92, 1B
  • Job safety laws take a tough turn; Shame prompted state to improve, but some employers are displeased - Jy 26 92, 1
  • Workplace safety legislation; the bills they passed (Chart) - Jy 26 92, 10A
  • Under the Dome: Fitch says Plyler MIA on labor laws - Au 16 92, 1C
  • Tar Heel editors speak: Gardner misses on workplace safety - Se 13 92, 27A
  • Sawdust explodes in silo; 5 hurt; Beaufort plant (Atlantic Veneer) had been fined for safety violations - De 5 92, 5B
  • Proposed safety regulations (Chart) - De 15 92, 2B
  • Work safety sequel looms; Panel proposes tougher rules - De 15 92, 1B
  • Editorial: Suits for injured workers - De 18 92, 18A
  • Under the Dome: Lawmakers grill worker advocates - De 18 92, 1B
Occupational Safety and Health
  • Business group seeks to sway state response to Hamlet fire - Ja 7 92, 5B
  • Editorial: Big business and safety - Ja 8 92, 8A
  • State workplace safety director (Oppold) given new duties - Ja 15 92, 11C
  • Hamlet fire raises concerns for safety; Workers group sees increase in queries - Ja 20 92, 6B
  • Under the Dome: Remember Hamlet, coalition urges - Ja 27 92, 1B
  • Unlearned lessons; Government won't prevent more Hamlet disasters; individuals will - Fe 2 92, 1J
  • Editorial: Job deaths unheeded...and secrets on the farm - Fe 18 92, 10A
  • State, U.S. still trying to resolve safety inspections - Fe 21 92, 8B
  • Workers decry unsafe conditions - Fe 25 92, 4B
  • More worker-safety testimony sought - Fe 26 92, 4B
  • Textile union lodges complaint about air at Texfi yarn plant - Mr 11 92, 9C
  • Danger: Government at work; Public employers pay no fines though safety violations numerous - Mr 14 92, 1
  • Inmate orderlies at Butner file suit for protective gear - Mr 14 92, 2B
  • Major government violators (Chart) - Mr 14 92, 1
  • Job safety expert says U.S. should toughen penalties for violators - Mr 19 92, 5B
  • Proposals to boost job safety swamp legislative study panel - Mr 25 92, 5B
  • Legislators doubt agencies will practice safety message - Mr 31 92, 4B
  • Getting better (workplace safety program; Chart) - Ap 5 92, 10A
  • Measuring North Carolina (Charts) - Ap 5 92, 10A
  • Other safety programs share N.C.'s problems - Ap 5 92, 1
  • Panel starts drafting tougher safety laws - Ap 7 92, 2B
  • Job-safety reforms proposed; Hamlet fire spurs recommendations - Ap 8 92, 1
  • Suggestions for safety (Chart) - Ap 8 92, 8A
  • Company (Wilmington Shipyard) has history of safety violations - Ap 11 92, 5B
  • Under the Dome: Safety legislation to be broken up - Ap 12 92, 1C
  • Former Hamlet workers appeal for upgrade in worker safety - Ap 14 92, 8B
  • Editorial: Safety needs safe passage - Ap 16 92, 16A
  • Panel on job safety retreats on package; Group trims proposal from recommendations - Ap 28 92, 5B
  • $5 million is sought for OSHA; Outgoing labor commissioner calls proposal 'bare-bones' request - My 14 92, 4B
  • Safety, lottery issues await legislators on return - My 26 92, 1
  • Workplace bills headed to floor - My 27 92, 4B
  • 'Compassion demands' workplace-safety bills, Blue says - My 28 92, 4B
  • Editorial: - No yielding on safety - My 29 92, 12A
  • N.C. clergy to lobby for workplace safety - My 29 92, 4B
  • Budget panel nears vote on job safety bills - Jn 2 92, 4B
  • Workplace safety bill hung up in committee - Jn 4 92, 4B
  • Work safety bills advance in House - Jn 5 92, 1B
  • Safety budget could boom; More inspectors would be hired - Jn 6 92, 1B
  • Editorial: Nitpickers vs. worker safety - Jn 7 92, 22A
Occupational Safety and Health
  • Bill would make labor policy set by board, not commissioner - My 22 85 8A
  • Editorial: the regulated as regulators - My 24 85 22A
Occupational Safety and Health
  • Editorial: Ruling injures workers - Fe 21 86 18A
  • Funds lacking to enforce (chemical right-to-know) law, Brooks says - Jn 26 86 8B
  • Editorial: Chemical enforcers needed - Jn 29 86 8A
  • N.C. work climate ranks low in survey - Se 30 86 9D
  • Duke Power workers seek safety changes - No 11 86 14A
  • On-the-job electrocutions alarm state - No 28 86 24D
Occupational Safety and Health
  • Spice firm to investigate seven workers' ailments - Ja 15 83 4C
  • Field sanitation rules for farm workers could take effect by July 1, official says - My 18 83 3C
  • Growers criticize proposed field sanitation rules - My 24 83 2C
  • Editorial: Decency for farm workers - My 26 83 4A
Occupational Safety and Health
  • State leaves nurse (WIGGINS) jobless after injury - Fe 15 87 1
  • Utility (Duke Power) facing tougher penalty (in death of worker) - Mr 22 87 41A
  • Environmentalists assail civil-justice bill - My 15 87 12A
  • Policy on job-protection proposed for state workers - Jn 2 87 1C
  • Workers barred from Onslow warehouse (where toxic chemicals stored) - Jy 17 87 26D
  • Wilmington cited on 5 counts for August gas explosion - Oc 22 87 3C
Occupational Safety and Health
  • State obtains extension for cotton dust comment - Mr 28 82 33A
  • CP and L plants rank lowest in safety report - Au 19 82 1C
  • Textile mill jobs in N. C. among most hazardous - Se 6 82 12C
  • Petroleum industry injury rate highest - Se 12 82 38A
  • Official praises safety of N. C. industrial units - Se 26 82 14D
  • N. C. job safety above average, official reports - No 28 82 44A
  • N. C. agency studying new federal job health rules - De 30 82 2C
Occupational Safety and Health
  • State questions the health risks of methanol production from peat - Ja 19 84 1C
  • Duracell told to pay ex-worker who suffered mercury poisoning - Ja 22 84 34A
  • OSHA 'right-to-know' standards topic of series of public hearings - Se 2 84 46A
  • GE hid violations at nuclear site, attorney says - De 19 84 2C
Occupational Safety and Health
  • Rigid labor rules raise cost of health care - Oc 1 88 13A
Occupational Safety and Health
  • Furniture makers pleased with wood dust standards - Ja 14 89 8B
  • Duke Power faces few OSHA inspections - Mr 22 89 1
  • Editorial: A farce that hurts workers - Mr 24 89 16A
  • Editorial: Deadly hazards of working - My 9 89 12A
  • Worker says Perdue insensitive to injuries - Jn 7 89 16C
  • Doctor seeks cooperation in 'farm medicine' - Jy 25 89 3C
  • Poultry trade report alleges many dangers - Jy 25 89 3C
  • Dust standards affect N.C. furniture makers - Se 6 89 2C