N&O Index Card Listings
Displaying 71-74 of 74 results.
Zoning - Wake County
- Rural northern Wake tract rezoned for subdivision - Ja 19 89 2C
- Most at hearing back rezoning along Neuse (Map) - Ap 25 89 2C
- Senate OKs bill allowing newspaper notices (when zoning affects property) - My 3 89 2C
- Wake to weigh zoning change for land near Shearon Harris (Map) - Au 8 89 1C
- Rezoning bid splits Wake board (Map) - No 21 89 4C
- Rezoning asked near loop route - De 11 89 1B
- Board recommends rezoning 52 acres (near proposed Outer Loop) - De 21 89 2B
Zoning - Wake County
- Rolesville board delays Rogers Ridge bid after hearing concerns from landowners - Ja 5 88 14C
- Watershed landowners fear nest eggs on line - Ja 11 88 1C
- Wake planners back rezoning for a strip shopping center - Ap 7 88 4C
- Zoning change decision delayed for more study - De 22 88 4C
Zoning - Wake County
- Board stands by rezonings at Six Forks and Strickland - Ja 8 91 1B
- Editorial: Stand against strip sprawl - Au 25 91 6J
- U.S. 64 zoning assailed; Owners cite loss in land profits - Au 26 91 1B
- Wake commissioners limit U.S. 64 growth - Au 27 91 1
Zoning - Wake County
- Highway zoning debated; Wake board targets 'strip development' - Ja 1 90 1B
- Wake to consider rezoning properties near Swift Creek - Ja 15 90 3B
- Builder proposes 10-home-per-acre zoning classification - Jn 8 90 2B
- Editorial: - Ten good homes per acre? - Jn 18 90 6A
- High-density housing proposal to get study - Jn 27 90 1B
- Planners oppose (denser) development request - Jn 28 90 2B
- Bulldozers may alter watershed; Landowner proposes changing lay of land - Se 26 90 1B
- U.S. 401 rezoning sought; Up to 4,000 residences possible at Spring Forest - No 16 90 1B
- Commissioners delay vote on rezoning requests (Six Forks & Strickland Rds.) - No 21 90 2B
- County seeks alternative to strip development - No 23 90 1B
- Panel OKs watershed building; Board approves school construction and rezoning; critics assail moves - No 27 90 1B
