N&O Index Card Listings
Displaying 1-10 of 15 results.
Apportionment (Election Law)
- Delays in redistricting ruling threaten schedule, Ramsey says - Ja 5 82 26
- Computer pros to aid redistricting effort - Ja 7 82 34
- Under the dome: Districting woes spur Washington trip - Ja 12 82 1
- Mixed approach proposed for redistricting - Ja 19 82 21
- (Justice) Department vetoes redistricting plan - Ja 22 82 1
- Mixed district bag draws tentative OK - Ja 23 82 22
- Lawmakers may trim absentee voting time - Ja 25 82 19
- Under the dome: New study of district plan may be sought - Ja 27 82 1
- Details of House redistricting plan - Ja 29 82 11
- Details of Senate redistricting plan - Ja 29 82 10
- Redistricting panels vote to split counties - Ja 29 82 1
- Redistricting plans undergo informal review - Ja 30 82 34
- Under the dome: Troopers delivering redistricting plan (to county courthouses) - Ja 30 82 1
- County, township split protested (Wake Forest township) - Fe 2 82 17
- Under the dome: Durham's spot in district plan discussed - Fe 2 82 1
- Congressional redistricting fight to reopen - Fe 3 82 22
- Lawmaker assails absence of minorities (in General Assembly) - Fe 3 82 22
- 2nd, 4th districts to undergo change in congressional redistricting plan - Fe 4 82 39
- Local politicians, black leaders blast latest redistricting plans - Fe 5 82 1D
- Congressmen prefer '81 plan, Jones says - Fe 6 82 8A
- Panel adopts N. C. House plan with four new black districts - Fe 6 82 1
- Black districts pose ironic threat to liberals - Fe 7 82 27A
- Under the dome: Jones meets with redistricting lawyer - Fe 7 82 1
- Editorial: Last chance for legislators - Fe 9 82 4A
- Redistricting efforts to be renewed today - Fe 9 82 5B
- House, Senate district plans advance - Fe 10 82 1
- Legislative panels back plan to shift Durham to 2nd - Fe 10 82 18A
- House, Senate approve plans for legislative redistricting - Fe 11 82 1
- Pleas fail to keep Durham from 2nd - Fe 11 82 1
- Legislature enacts new redistricting plan, adjourns - Fe 12 82 4D
- Redistricting plan contains inequities, Rep. Fountain says - Fe 12 82 4D
- Under the dome: Self-preservation marks district battle - Fe 13 82 1
- Districting woes may have cost Democrats chance to oust GOP - Fe 14 82 32A
- Effects of redistricting depend on where you sit - Fe 14 82 32A
- NAACP group continues lawsuit over redistricting - Fe 16 82 3C
- Redistricting may face more court trouble - Fe 20 82 14A
- Farmer (Speed) to represent part of Wake in Senate - Fe 21 82 25A
- Congressional districting plan OK'd - Mr 12 82 1
- Fight renewed against redistricting plan - Mr 18 82 19A
- Under the dome: No imminent districting decision seen - Mr 30 82 1
- Under the dome: State legislators to push for OK of district plans - Ap 9 82 12A
- Under the dome: Redistricting meeting spurs optimism - Ap 10 82 1
- N. C. redistricting plans rejected - Ap 20 82 1
- Redistricting reply angers legislators - Ap 21 82 10C
- Under the dome: Officials to seek redistricting advice - Ap 22 82 1
- Legislative session requested to decide redistricting moves - Ap 23 82 1D
- Hunt orders redistricting session - Ap 24 82 1C
- Editorial: Redistricting, again - Ap 25 82 4D
- Redistricting woes wreck primary dates - Ap 25 82 30A
- Redistricting change begun; primary on June 10 studied - Ap 27 82 1C
- Redistricting plans, June primary OK'd - Ap 28 82 1
- Editorial: Incumbents gain an edge - Ap 30 82 4A
- N. C. accepts June 29 primary; district plans given federal OK - My 1 82 1
- 13 Forsyth voters' lawsuit challenges redistricting plan - My 5 82 3C
- 13 Forsyth voters have suit filed to fight parts of redistricting plan - My 5 82 12C
Apportionment (Election Law)
- Martin may retain private attorney (for case against redistricting) - Jn 14 85 5D
- Justice Dept. (and NC) seeks change in vote plan - Ap 18 85 1
- Mood of reluctance greets redistrict news in legislature - Ap 18 85 6A
- Moore County redistricting measure called gerrymandering by Republicans - Ap 18 85 19A
- Bill seeks single-member legislative districts - Ap 20 85 17A
- Legal Defense Fund urges justices to uphold N.C. redistricting - Ap 24 85 8B
- Supreme Court to review N.C. redistricting plan - Ap 30 85 1C
- Elections board reverses stand on redistricting - Jn 3 85 1C
- Partisan battle taking shape in redistricting - Jn 4 85 1
- Under the dome: Black lawyers ask end to redistricting appeal - Jn 11 85 5A
- State to continue redistricting appeal - Jn 13 85 1C
- Martin assails resolution on redistricting suit counsel - Jn 20 85 20C
- State board of Elections barred from leaving redistricting case - Jn 26 85 1C
- Effort to stop board from hiring counsel in districting case halted - Jy 4 85 5C
- Reagan administration enters N.C. redistricting case - Jy 10 85 4C
- Ethics panel says election official should not act in redistricting case - Au 7 85 1C
- Dole, Kennedy join Martin, oppose state on redistricting - Au 31 85 1
- Redistricting suit could cost $7,882 - Se 10 85 16C
- Board to pay legal fee for redistricting case - Se 13 85 12A
- N.C. test case forges unusual alliances - Se 13 85 14A
- Redistricting plan (Princeville) gets U.S. approval - No 3 85 41A
- Under the dome: Thornburg to defend (redistricting) plan before high court - No 17 85 5A
- N.C. voting district dispute goes before high court this week - De 3 85 5C
- Thornburg, Chambers square off at Supreme Court over redistricting - De 5 85 1
- N.C. case a question of what is fair for black voters - De 10 85 19A
Apportionment (Election Law)
- 1st Congressional District; the sprawling 1st - (Map) - Ap 8 92, 1
- Federal court rejects another challenge of congressional districts - Ap 28 92, 7B
- Under the Dome: N.Y. redistricting to have N.C. touch - My 20 92, 1B
- GOP lawmakers lose redistricting lawsuit - Jy 4 92, 5B
- Court upholds minority district - Au 8 92, 8B
- Redistricting poses new challenge for Valentine - Se 30 92, 1B
- U.S. Supreme Court upholds redistricting in N.C. - Oc 6 92, 2B
- 2 black districts urged; Proposal favors N.C. democrats - Ja 10 92, 1
- A proposal for two black congressional districts - (Map) - Ja 10 92, 15A
- A proposal for two black congressional districts - (Map) - Ja 12 92, 2C
- District plan would turn candidates into road runners - Ja 12 92, 1C
- Editorial: I-85 no route to Congress - Ja 13 92, 8A
- House, Senate district plans advance; Partisan splits mark debates on proposals - Ja 14 92, 1
- Michaux wants - black House seat for Durham - Ja 14 92, 9A
- Legislators OK plans adding 4 black seats - Ja 15 92, 1B
- Legislature poised at fateful redistricting line - Ja 17 92, 16A
- Plan could cost GOP; New seat would be Democratic - Ja 17 92, 1B
- Congressional districts proposed by Democrats in N.C. House - (Map) - Ja 19 92, 10A
- House Democrats offer district plan; Map similar to congressional proposal - Ja 19 92, 1
- Congressional districts proposed by Democrats in N.C. Senate - (Map) - Ja 20 92, 7A
- House, Senate leaders produce similar redistricting proposals - Ja 20 92, 1
- Editorial: Reading the 'inkblot' - Ja 21 92, 8A
- Redistricting plans upset local officials; Some counties split among three districts - Ja 21 92, 1
- Congressional districts proposed by the League of Women Voters - (Map) - Ja 23 92, 15A
- Let sound principles shape new districts - Ja 23 92, 15A
- Redistricting spats stymie lawmakers; House, Senate proposals differ on some lines - Ja 23 92, 6B
- Under the Dome: Legal tab (for redistricting) on their minds - Ja 23 92, 2B
- Editorial: Rule, redistrict and ruin - Ja 24 92, 16A
- Redistricting plan ... by League of Women Voters would require some ... to run from unfamiliar districts - (Map) - Ja 24 92, 16A
- State House advances new U.S. House plan - Ja 24 92, 2B
- Congressional districts adopted by the General Assembly - (Map) - Ja 25 92, 1
- District demographics; New congressional districts by race and party registration - (Chart) - Ja 25 92, 13A
- Senate enacts new district plan; Vote tracks party lines - Ja 25 92, 1
- Where the votes are - (Chart) - Ja 25 92, 13A
- GOP assails 'blatant gerrymandering' in plans - Ja 29 92, 5B
Apportionment (Election Law)
- Editorial: Battle of the maps - Ja 3 92, 8A
- Party loyalty, black gains clash in redistricting - Ja 7 92, 1
- Redistricting work resumes with spat - Ja 8 92, 5B
- GOP seeks change in district map; Congressmen want no action in court - Ja 9 92, 1B
- Congressional districts approved by the U.S. Justice Dept. - (Map) - Fe 7 92, 14A
- Minority districts in legislature - Fe 7 92, 14A
- Editorial: See 'em in court - Fe 8 92, 14A
- Under the Dome: Candidate praying for a court ruling (on Congressional Districts) - Fe 22 92, 1B
- Agency can't reject state's 'ugly' districts - Fe 27 92, 2B
- GOP sues over redistricting; Voters would be ill-served, suit says - Fe 29 92, 1
- Dismissal sought in redistricting suit - Mr 3 92, 2B
- Judicial panel set to hear GOP suit on House districts - Mr 7 92, 2B
- Federal judge approves redistricting in Lenoir Co. - Mr 10 92, 4B
- GOP suit on districts thrown out; Federal court OKs congressional plan - Mr 10 92, 1
- Under the Dome: Raleigh law firm feasting for scrap - Mr 11 92, 1B
- Rehnquist rejects GOP effort to block congressional races - Mr 12 92, 1B
- Road to redistricting - (Chart) - Mr 12 92, 1B
- 2nd suit challenges state's new districts; Durham lawyer says plan segregates voters - Mr 13 92, 2B
- Under the Dome: Keeping score over redistricting plan - Mr 22 92, 1C
- Requests for new maps overwhelm legislature - Mr 27 92, 4B
Apportionment (Election Law)
- Fund offers way to settle redistricting suit - Ja 25 83 2C
- Under the dome: House squelches plan to map districts early - Jn 3 83 10A
- Blacks to test redistricting in trial - Jy 25 83 6A
- Statistician says reapportionment helped blacks in elections - Au 4 83 14C
- Ruling allows split-county (legislative) districts - Se 23 83 1
- Briefs filed in lawsuit charging redistricting would hurt black voters - Oc 8 83 2C
Apportionment (Election Law)
- Legislators to request session on redistricting next week - Fe 29 84 1
- Senators can't agree on new 2nd district - Mr 2 84 5D
- Hunt calls Assembly into session Wednesday (to redraw legislative
- districts) - Mr 4 84 38A
- Single-seat districts in Wake to be considered - Mr 6 84 1C
- Single-seat districts proposed for Wake - Mr 7 84 1
- New districts OK'd despite warnings (by blacks) - Mr 8 84 1
- Assembly ends redistricting work - Mr 9 84 1D
- Royall dissatisfied with shift of Durham precinct - Mr 10 84 2C
- Blacks file motion to redistrict 4 counties - Mr 17 84 5C
- Under the dome: Redistricting error counted Vance twice - Mr 21 84 1
- Elections face delay as new lines are studied - Ap 20 84 4D
- Some Senate, House districts OK'd - Ap 21 84 1
- Districts under redistricting cloud will be bypassed May 8 - Ap 29 84 39A
- Justice OKs 6 more revised Senate districts - Ap 29 84 31A
- Senate District 14 approved; primary set for July 17 - My 2 84 10A
- Judges approve seven revised N.C. Senate districts - My 11 84 2D
- More facts sought before panel approves 2 House districts (Nash,
- Wilson, Edgcombe) - My 17 84 19A
- Redistricting plans for 3 counties rejected (Nash, Wilson, Edgecombe) - Oc 3 84 2C
- Federal judges give approval to legislative redistricting plan (for
- Nash, Edgecomb, Wilson counties) - No 6 84 8A
Apportionment (Election Law)
- Martin challenges districting (for election of judges) - De 24 87 1
- Suit on court districts latest move in old game - De 25 87 1C
Apportionment (Election Law)
- Martin may retain private attorney (for case against redistricting) - Jn 14 85 5D
- Justice Dept. (and NC) seeks change in vote plan - Ap 18 85 1
- Mood of reluctance greets redistrict news in legislature - Ap 18 85 6A
- Moore County redistricting measure called gerrymandering by Republicans - Ap 18 85 19A
- Bill seeks single-member legislative districts - Ap 20 85 17A
- Legal Defense Fund urges justices to uphold N.C. redistricting - Ap 24 85 8B
- Supreme Court to review N.C. redistricting plan - Ap 30 85 1C
- Elections board reverses stand on redistricting - Jn 3 85 1C
- Partisan battle taking shape in redistricting - Jn 4 85 1
- Under the dome: Black lawyers ask end to redistricting appeal - Jn 11 85 5A
- State to continue redistricting appeal - Jn 13 85 1C
- Martin assails resolution on redistricting suit counsel - Jn 20 85 20C
- State board of Elections barred from leaving redistricting case - Jn 26 85 1C
- Effort to stop board from hiring counsel in districting case halted - Jy 4 85 5C
- Reagan administration enters N.C. redistricting case - Jy 10 85 4C
- Ethics panel says election official should not act in redistricting case - Au 7 85 1C
- Dole, Kennedy join Martin, oppose state on redistricting - Au 31 85 1
- Redistricting suit could cost $7,882 - Se 10 85 16C
- Board to pay legal fee for redistricting case - Se 13 85 12A
- N.C. test case forges unusual alliances - Se 13 85 14A
- Redistricting plan (Princeville) gets U.S. approval - No 3 85 41A
- Under the dome: Thornburg to defend (redistricting) plan before high court - No 17 85 5A
- 18
Apportionment (Election Law)
- N.C. voting district dispute goes before high court this week - De 3 85 5C
- Thornburg, Chambers square off at Supreme Court over redistricting - De 5 85 1
- N.C. case a question of what is fair for black voters - De 10 85 19A
Apportionment (Election Law)
- Politicians assert ruling on districts could help GOP - Ja 31 84 1
- Editorial: New districts will come - Fe 1 84 4A
- Ramsey to poll legislators on redistricting - Fe 1 84 3C
- Legislative leaders to seek stay of redistricting ruling - Fe 3 84 2D
- State asks judges to delay order for revising districts - Fe 4 84 2C
- State to petition high court to delay redistricting order - Fe 11 84 1C
- High court asked to OK N.C. districts for primary - Fe 15 84 1C
- Black groups may challenge runoffs after judge's remarks - Fe 16 84 1
- Blacks seek redistricting of N.C. Legislature in '84 - Fe 22 84 4C
- N.C. denied more time to redistrict - Fe 25 84 1
- Under the dome: Judge claims N.C. racism flourishing - Fe 26 84 1
- 2nd Senatorial District expected to be tough to redraw - Fe 28 84 2C
