N&O Index Card Listings
Displaying 1-10 of 11 results.
Highway Fund
- Committee reroutes plan for permanent road fund - Mr 27 87 11A
- Fund proposal stalls - Mr 29 87 22A
- Funds for N.C. roads lag behind tax cost, figures show - Ap 11 87 4C
Highway Fund
- Governor will let General Assembly find matching federal highway funds - Ja 19 83 8A
- Under the dome: Group targets trucks for highway funds - Fe 16 83 1
- Panel targets spending cuts to reduce highway budget 1% - Fe 26 83 2C
- Options on getting highway aid presented - Mr 5 83 7A
Highway Fund
- State gets $70 million for road work - Fe 7 92, 6B
- State responds to dispute by freezing highway funds - Jy 2 92, 3B
Highway Fund
- Under the Dome: Harrelson to seek (federal highway) funds - Ja 4 91 3B
- Road fund faces small budget cut; Panel gives more priority to highway maintenance - Ap 17 91 1B
- Highway Fund may pay for driver's ed - Ap 20 91 1B
- Alliance could lure federal road funds - Ap 27 91 3B
- Road-fund loan proposed to aid beleaguered budget - My 4 91 3B
- Under the Dome: Harrelson debunks road riches myth - My 31 91 1B
- Sanford, Helms join Senate fight to change highway funding rules - Jn 12 91 7A
- N.C. likely to get extra $400 million in highway funds - Jn 19 91 3A
- Tar Heel editors speak: Highway bill greased with pork - Au 4 91 7J
- Fund woes force state to delay long-range road-building plan - No 1 91 3B
- Drop in car sales blamed for dent in road funding - No 2 91 8B
- U.S. funds may ease road woes; Increase could offset lagging state revenue - No 5 91 5B
- N.C.'s road slice is bigger - No 28 91 5B
Highway Fund
- Legislative roundup: Highway plan - Mr 12 89 22A
- House panel endorses $8.6 billion road plan - Mr 22 89 16C
- Senate panel backs $8.6 billion road bill - Mr 23 89 24A
- House panel rejects road plan safeguard - Mr 30 89 14C
- Roads construction bill inches ahead in House - Ap 6 89 12A
- Building North Carolina's highways (Chart) - Ap 9 89 26A
- How to pay for road bill under debate - Ap 9 89 23A
- Senate panel slices Martin's $20 million road fund - Ap 11 89 18C
- Debate opens on funding $8.6 billion road plan - Ap 19 89 8A
- Alternative funding methods for highway package criticized - Ap 20 89 21A
- House panel seeks data on bonds to fund road plan - Ap 28 89 19A
- Partisan spat breaks out in Senate over road fund - My 10 89 8A
- Road package's funding plan won't meet schedule - My 18 89 26A
- Editorial: 'Raleigh fever' on highways - My 19 89 16A
- New plan posed to fund state road package - My 20 89 1C
- Point of view: Why not drive now, pay for pavement later? - My 24 89 11A
- Revised funding plan unveiled for road-construction package - My 25 89 1C
- House panel clears $8.6 billion road plan - My 26 89 16A
- Leaders debate sales-tax hike, road funding - My 26 89 1C
- Public vote on road plan gains support - My 28 89 31A
- Road-plan referendum proposed - My 31 89 16C
- Editorial: - No detour on roads - Jn 1 89 18A
- House gives tentative OK to $8.6 billion road plan - Jn 1 89 1
- House votes 90-25 to OK $8.6 billion highway plan - Jn 2 89 12A
- How the House voted on road plan - Jn 2 89 12A
- Senate panel endorses 15-year, $8.6 billion road-building plan - Jn 9 89 17A
- Two plans to pay for new roads - Jn 9 89 17A
- Senate Democrats may tap road funds for pay raises - Jn 15 89 1
- Martin assails bid to tap road funds for raises - Jn 16 89 3C
- Democrats vote to tap road funds for raises - Jn 20 89 1
- 12-year road plan pushed; Eastern N.C. mayors support Martin plan - Jn 27 89 16C
- Senate pay-raise funding plan tied to House road bill - Jn 30 89 17A
- Legislators to return to work on highway, salary bills - Jy 1 89 15A
- State budget compromise proposed; House plan funds roads, pay hikes - Jy 13 89 1
- Senate pushes longer highway-building plan - Jy 14 89 8A
- Views vary in dispute on budget - Jy 15 89 11A
- Under the Dome: Buttons pressing legislators on roads - Jy 20 89 1
- House changes stand in talks over highways, budget - Jy 21 89 14A
- Budget accord reached on roads, pay - Jy 22 89 1
- Martin and Gardner blast roads, pay plan - Jy 25 89 5A
- Democrats, Republicans trade charges on road, veto battles - Jy 26 89 18C
- Road, pay bill stalled by dispute; Opposition by Gardner, Martin irks Democrats - Jy 26 89 1
- Roads, pay measure gets tentative OK - Jy 27 89 1
- Roads, pay bill gets final OK in legislature - Jy 28 89 1C
- Increase in N.C. highway funds (Chart) - Au 4 89 11A
- Editorial: Billions for roads, but... - Au 15 89 10A
- $9 billion road plan might bring 800 jobs - Oc 28 89 4C
Highway Fund
- Road funding recommendation deferred - Ja 18 89 5A
- Martin, legislators discuss ways to fund highway needs - Ja 25 89 18C
- Effort to increase funding for highways hits roadblock - Ja 28 89 10A
- Editorial: Sharing the highway wealth - Ja 30 89 10A
- Harrington urges fuel-tax hike, car-title fee to boost road funds - Fe 7 89 1
- Editorial: Building new roads...and saving old rails - Fe 10 89 14A
- Harrington urges speed-up on highway funding talks - Fe 10 89 6D
- Road-funding plan calls for fuel-tax hike - Fe 16 89 1
- Editorial: The reluctant highwayman - Fe 17 89 14A
- Tax hikes depend on ribbon-cutting factor - Fe 17 89 14A
- Martin not giving his support to specific road-funding plan - Fe 18 89 1
- Road panel backs 5 1/4 cent fuel tax hike - Fe 21 89 1
- Auto title transfer fee opposed; Dealers say sales would be hurt - Fe 22 89 5B
- Editorial: Rolling out a road plan - Fe 22 89 22A
- Governor endorses road plan; Martin hints at tax hike for schools - Fe 22 89 1
- Legislative leaders predict approval of highway plan - Fe 23 89 20A
- Legislative roundup: Highways - Fe 26 89 24A
- Highway plan calls for toll roads study - Fe 27 89 5B
- Martin pitches road plans to congressional delegation - Mr 1 89 8A
- Alternate roads fee proposed; Legislator (Goldston) suggests 3 percent 'user fee' - Mr 9 89 1C
- Legislator (Miller) questions lack of mass-transit funds in road package - Mr 10 89 21A
Highway Fund
- Budget cuts could hamper road plans - Ja 9 88 4C
- Solutions urged to highway funding shortfall - Ja 28 88 2C
- Legislators favor user fees to speed highway projects - Ap 1 88 3C
- Jordan calls Martin road plan a drive for election-year gains - Ap 8 88 6D
- Public willing to pay more for roads, state panel says - Ap 16 88 2C
- Lt. gov. hopefuls disagree on how to fund roads - Ap 24 88 33A
- Harrington proposes $450 million bond issue for roadwork backlog - Ma 3 88 18C
- Harrington says $450 million bond plan could help sell road financing to public - Ma 10 88 8B
- Billions sought for 'era of highways' - Ma 11 88 18C
- Royall chides legislators for highway fundings - Ma 12 88 2C
- Martin may file suit involving road funds - Jy 30 88 8B
- Road, transit costs absorb traffic experts - Se 1 88 24A
- Rand asks bond issue for roads needed for economic growth - Se 14 88 18C
- Bond issue, gas tax backed to pay for new roads - Oc 5 88 WA-1
- $1 billion bond, tax hikes may be needed for roads - No 11 88 3C
- Editorial: Paying for the paving - No 13 88 6D
- Highways chief says $3.06 billion needed - No 18 88 1C
- Editorial: Reality meets the road - No 19 88 16A
- Editorial: A coalition for highways - No 23 88 22A
- Martin urges increasing road funds - De 21 88 3c
- Editorial: Removing a roadblock - De 22 88 16A