N&O Index Card Listings
Displaying 1-10 of 12 results.
Nuclear Power Plants
- Collective exposure to workers reported high at CP and L N-plants - Ja 21 86 16C
- Duke N-plant to cost less than expected, officials say - Ja 30 86 5C
- Leak found; (McGuire) nuclear plant closed - Ap 16 86 2C
- N.C. plants safer, say professor, CP and L chief - Ap 30 86 19A
- Concerns arise over planning for emergencies at N-plants - My 12 86 1
- N-plant opponents bring effort to Triangle - My 15 86 4C
- Under the dome: Congressmen may influence N-power bills - Jy 1 86 1
- Poor labeling cited in N-plant mishap near Charlotte (Catawba) - Jy 3 86 3C
Nuclear Power Plants
- Duke loses permit for Davie N-plant site - Fe 15 84 5C
- Biologists seek to protect fish from hazards of (Brunswick) nuclear
- plant - Mr 18 84 17B
- Brunswick nuclear unit shut down - Mr 29 84 1
- Emergency instructions hidden in Duke pamphlets, NRC told - My 12 84 20C
- CP and L improves operations at nuclear plants - Au 28 84 1
- Nuclear plants cited as answer to power needs - Se 11 84 16C
- Lightning shuts down reactor as utilities get ready for Diana
- (Brunswick plant) - Se 12 84 8A
- (Catawba) Nuclear plant called threat to residents - Se 14 84 18D
- Welder dismissed by Duke Power says mistakes ignored at (Catawba)
- N-plant - Oc 13 84 8B
- CP and L mends (Brunswick) N-plant operation, public relations, analyst
- says - No 9 84 1D
- GE hid violations at nuclear site, attorney says - De 19 84 2C
Nuclear Power Plants
- Duke's new chief sees dim nuclear future - Ap 25 82 8D
- Duke, CP and L say plant problems will be fixed - My 17 82 14C
- Duke backs N. C. aid to clean up (Three Mile Island) reactor - Jy 6 82 8A
- CP and L N-plants cited by NRC in 12 incidents - Jy 8 82 1C
- CP and L chief defends plants' safety record - Jy 9 82 6B
- Editorial: A question of safety - Jy 10 82 4A
- High costs, safety fines plague CP and L N-plants - Se 5 82 1
- Cost of nuclear safety rules needs attention, official says - Oc 8 82 4D
- CP and L to repair Brunswick reactor; 6-month shutdown may boost bills - De 2 82 1C
- Alternatives to coal, N-plants not feasible, Duke study says - De 9 82 3C
Nuclear Power Plants
- McGuire nuclear plant shut for modifications - Ja 22 83 10A
- N-plants termed unnecessary; Staff wants 2 units canceled - Fe 5 83 1
- Nuclear plant performance at CP and L fell to 36% in '82 - Fe 17 83 1
- Battle plan readied for Wake N-plant mishap - Fe 21 83 1
- CP and L plant viewed with fear, confusion - Fe 21 83 7A
- CP and L tells commission of goal to improve Brunswick plant - Fe 22 83 12C
- Two nuclear plants left off construction schedule - Mr 16 83 12C
- Ruling on N-plants expected to have little N. C. effect - Ap 21 83 7A
- Duke scraps plans to finish Cherokee Nuclear Unit I - Ap 30 83 16C
- Failed promise of N-plants sends money down drain - My 17 83 1D
- Citizen groups fear nuclear plant flaws - Jn 27 83 3C
- Bill for scrapped nuclear plant unsettled - Jy 10 83 14D
- NRC to shut Brunswick unit for check - Jy 15 83 1
- Water leak closes Brunswick N-plant - Jy 31 83 37A
- CP and L plant leak is tied to packing - Au 1 83 1C
- Seaweed clog in pipe delays Brunswick unit - Au 10 83 3C
- NRC official considers new Brunswick shutdown order - Au 14 83 40A
- Brunswick unit unlikely to be shut early, official says - Au 19 83 7B
- Brunswick N-plant worst-run in 1982, Nader group says - Se 20 83 1C
Nuclear Power Plants
- New rules for coal-fired plants to increase emissions, critics say - Ja 14 83 1D
- Power plants at Falls, Jordan dams considered for tax perks, energy use - No 18 83 1
Nuclear Power Plants
- N-plants keep watch on fire-retardant material - Au 25 92, 5B
- NRC rejects group's request to temporarily idle 7 plants - Au 25 92, 1D
Nuclear Power Plants
- NRC official praises nuclear plant near Southport - Oc 15 83 5C
- CP and L N-plant near Southport receives praise - Oc 16 83 36A
- CP and L nuclear incident rated most serious in 1980-81 (Brunswick plant) - No 16 83 2C
- Brunswick unit unlikely to be shut early, official says - No 19 83 7B
Nuclear Power Plants
- Panel approves plans for peat-fired plant (Craven County) - Mr 9 85 11A
- Group challenges power plant OK - Ap 16 85 2C
- From a 'wretched mill' to steam to electricity, power parallels growth - Jy 21 85 18-12
Nuclear Power Plants
- Radiation is released at plant near Charlotte (McGuire nuclear plant) - Fe 23 85 5C
- House subcommittees probe NRC region that includes N.C. - Au 9 85 6B
- Opposition to Duke nuclear plant brings higher rates for N.C. users - Au 23 85 17A
- Filmmaker (Owensby may buy nuclear plant - No 15 85 2C
- Tale of two nuclear plants - controversial and costly - No 24 85 1D
Nuclear Power Plants
- Thornburg seeks ruling against Duke Power for rate charges - Fe 10 87 5C
- $50,000 fine proposed against Duke Power Co. (McGuire violations) - Mr 10 87 2C
- Deep pools at N.C. reactors shelter tons of nuclear waste - My 11 87 7A
- Liability limits for N-plants called short - Au 2 87 31A
- Nuclear power plants in Carolinas warned of Iranian sabotage threats - Au 5 87 18C
- One of two reactors at McGuire closed - Au 17 87 3C
- Duke, CP and L nuclear plants criticized - Se 17 87 23A
- Nuclear plants expensive to unplug - Se 20 87 33A
- Electrical capacity plentiful without N-plants, group says - No 11 87 3C