N&O Index Card Listings
Displaying 1-10 of 14 results.
Run-off
- Extension of runoff controls backed - Fe 12 86 2C
- Panel fails to reach accord on runoff (from coastal development) - Mr 14 86 2D
- State eases proposed restriction of runoff into shellfishing waters - Mr 25 86 3C
- Panel backs stringent rules for rainwater runoff - Mr 26 86 5C
- Editorial: Tough runoff rules needed - Mr 28 86 18A
- Democrats endorse runoff law changes - Mr 29 86 1
- Fishermen, developers debate runoff pollution proposals - My 7 86 2C
- Rainwater runoff proposal discussed at Raleigh hearing - My 9 86 11B
- EMC member (Barber) offers storm-water runoff compromise - Au 8 86 19A
- Editorial: Shellfish need runoff rules - Au 13 86 16A
- Commission studying 3 proposals for rules - Au 25 86 8A
- Guidelines on storm runoff put coastal projects on hold - Au 25 86 1
- Tough runoff regulations favored by consultant (Kennedy) - Au 25 86 8A
- Environmental panel thineed before vote (on runoff into shellfish beds) - Se 10 86 1
- Editorial: Coastal runoff rules crucial - Se 11 86 22A
- Panel OKs rules to limit building near shellfish waters - Se 12 86 17A
Run-off
- Nitrogen runoff poses threat to tidal creeks - Jy 12 92, 6A
- Debate over runoff mires plans for links in Falls watershed - No 11 92, 2B
Run-off
- Report urges cutting nitrogen in Pamlico - Ap 29 87 18C
- Anti-pollution plan seeks broader controls on storm-water runoff - My 30 87 10A
- Cary manager seeks derailment of proposal (to upgrade sewage plants in Neuse basin) - Jn 5 87 1D
- State farm runoff program has streams running clear - Jn 22 87 1C
- Storm runoff hearings to discuss regulations - Jn 25 87 24A
- Storm runoff rules for coast spark debate - Au 17 87 1C
- Developers, environmentalists disagree on water runoff plan - Au 21 87 WA-1
- Editorial: - No compromise on the coast - Au 24 87 8A
- Editorial: Runoff rules: another try - Oc 22 87 22A
- EMC will hear runoff opposition - No 10 87 18C
- EMC to vote today on coastal runoff - No 12 87 1C
- Coastal runoff rules reaffirmed; Environmentalists, fishermen assail vote - No 13 87 1C
- Environmentalists vow to battle run-off rules - No 24 87 16C
- Regulations for runoff differ widely in state - De 13 87 18A
Run-off
- Runoff fuels problems in watersheds - Se 26 83 1C
- Fish nursery inventory could spur tighter runoff rules - No 26 83 16C
Run-off
- Sewage, runoff pose dilemma in Falls Lake area - My 10 83 1C
- Peat plant's runoff effects debated - Jn 9 83 2C
- Soil runoff feared sullying mountain water - Jn 13 83 12C
- Task force says runoff (from farming and peat mining) may hurt fish - Jn 24 83 2D
Run-off
- Vegetation eases runoff's pollution - Fe 13 84 8B
- Hunt to seek funds to reduce pollution from farm runoff - Mr 29 84 21A
- Weather, other studies mold water runoff rules - De 10 84 6A
Run-off
- Wake official to ask commissioners to scrap law on stormwater runoff - Ja 18 85 1D
- Some commissioners want to scrap ordinance on development runoff - Ja 19 85 1C
- Condo plan (Permuda Island) may threaten shellfish zone, report says - Fe 9 85 18C
- Environmental Management panel asks staff for coastal growth advice - Mr 15 85 15A
- Official urges runoff rules be applied case-by-case - My 16 85 1C
- Storm-water runoff ruling delayed - Jn 14 85 19A
- Bill on storm-water runoff draws environmentalists' ire - Jy 3 85 17A
- Storm-water management bill advances - Jy 4 85 15B
- Rainwater drainage checked for danger to shrimp - Au 2 85 6B
- Battle lines drawn over coastal runoff standards - Au 18 85 34A
- Showdown expected over runoff plan - Oc 17 85 12A
- Proposals on storm-water runoff debated at commission hearing - Oc 18 85 20D
- Coastal storm-water action stalled - Oc 19 85 2C
- EMC requests delay in storm water rules adoption - De 13 85 5D
Run-Off
- Water angers owners; Drainage ills blamed on city (Raleigh) - Mr 29 90 1F
- State adds to limits on runoff; Development backers fears called unfounded - My 11 90 1
- (Olde Beau) Golf club won't be fined for runoff violations - Au 17 90 4B
