N&O Index Card Listings

Displaying 1-10 of 11 results.
Corporal Punishment
  • Claim of spankings spark council plan for parental consent - Mr 18 83 17A
  • Concern grows about corporal punishment in schools - Mr 28 83 1
  • Study says schools paddle poor, blacks more often - My 19 83 1
  • N. C. spanking of pupils rises despite trend - Jn 13 83 1C
Corporal Punishment
  • Forsyth County schools begin ban on spanking - Ja 23 92, 6B
  • N.C. school districts that ban corporal punishment - (Map) - No 7 92, 7A
  • Paddling ban sought in schools; Institute proposes other punishment - No 7 92, 1
Corporal Punishment
  • Paddling raises questions about religious freedom - Jn 24 84 1
  • Mother opposed to student paddling to testify before congressional
  • panel - Oc 17 84 4C
  • N. C. woman tells Senate subcommittee about paddling - Oc 18 84 2C
  • Spanking ban during day-care OK'd by panel - No 16 84 1D
Corporal Punishment
  • Ruling on paddling students seen as aid to parents in lawsuits - Fe 26 87 1C
  • Editorial: Sparing the rod and child - Mr 2 87 12A
  • Bill calls for warning before teachers spank - Mr 14 87 6A
  • House panel OKs spanking guidelines (for schools) - Ap 4 87 8A
  • House tentatively approves paddling measure - Ap 8 87 9A
  • Editorial: Spanking ban best answer - Ap 11 87 20A
  • Spanking policy bill delayed by committee - Ap 18 87 7A
  • House panel approves bill on spankings - Ap 25 87 5B
  • House tentatively OKs bill on school spankings - Ap 30 87 21A
  • House OKs measure on spankings in schools - My 7 87 34A
  • House OKs spanking in day-care centers - Jn 26 87 16A
  • N.C. schools must allow spanking under bill tentatively OK'd by Senate - Jn 30 87 5C
  • School spanking bill clears Senate 38-10 - Jy 1 87 10A
  • Legislature enacts law on corporal punishment - Jy 7 87 18C
  • Spanking, abuse linked at day-care hearing - Se 30 87 1
  • Editorial: Protecting children in day care - Oc 3 87 18A
  • Day-care spankings defended - Oc 6 87 12A
Corporal Punishment
  • Spanking ban to start Feb. 1 - No 17 84 4C
  • Editorial: in defense of toddlers - No 19 84 4A
Corporal Punishment
  • Editorial: - The rod, the child, the risk - Au 27 90 8A
  • Day care panel seeks to avoid suit over spanking ban - Au 31 90 3B
Corporal Punishment
  • Education board to support bill to develop alternatives to paddling - Mr 9 89 20A
  • Editorial: - Spare the rod - for good - Mr 13 89 8A
  • 16 systems could ban spanking for a time - Mr 15 89 11A
  • No-spanking test bill backed by House panel - Mr 30 89 14C
  • Amendment slows bill to ban school spanking - Ap 7 89 13A
  • In party-line vote, panel backs day-care spanking ban - My 3 89 18C
  • Panel backs bill to let schools ban spanking - Jn 1 89 16A
  • Panel OKs spankings in church day-care centers - Jy 6 89 11A
  • Editorial: - Spanking law: no exemptions - Jy 10 89 6A
  • Spanking exemption for church day-care tentatively approved - Jy 12 89 16C
  • Bill to ban spankings is defeated in House - Au 3 89 10A
  • Day-care panel agrees to settle suit on spanking ban - Se 8 89 3C
  • Policy may change day-care discipline to allow spanking - Se 9 89 3C
  • Thornburg rejects day-care spanking settlement - Se 13 89 24A
  • Tar Heel editors speak: - Spanking ban violates Constitution - Se 24 89 7D
  • New battle brews over spanking ban in day-care centers - No 16 89 3C
  • Action delayed on day-care spanking ban - No 17 89 5C
  • Under the Dome: - Spanking debate sparks bias claim - No 22 89 1
  • Paddling case is settled; School board agrees to pay couple $9,000 - No 29 89 3C
Corporal Punishment
  • Paddling in school restricted; Wake board approves policy on punishment - Fe 16 88 1
  • Editorial: The best of a bad law - Fe 17 88 14A
  • Day-care official (DELUCA) OKs spankings at church; Ruling cites state interference in religion - Oc 2 88 33A
  • Editorial: Suffer the little children - Oc 4 88 12A
  • Tar Heel editors speak: A common-sense ruling on spanking - Oc 16 88 7D
  • Bid to allow day-care spanking denied - No 18 88 1C
Corporal Punishment
  • Paddling should not be banned, educators tell panel - Fe 27 86 3C
  • Church day-care centers told to end paddling - My 9 86 4D
  • Churches to fight compliance order on spanking ban in day-care centers - Oc 3 86 1
  • Editorial: - No swats for tots in N.C. - Oc 5 86 16A
Corporal Punishment
  • Baptist deacon charged after boy, 6, spanked - Fe 15 91 4B
  • Spanking appeal gets under way; Time alters shape of day-care case - Mr 22 91 1B
  • Ruling stirs debate on day-care spankings - Ap 26 91 4B
  • Panel would exempt churches from day-care spanking ban - My 3 91 3B
  • Spanking-ban bill advances in House - My 8 91 3B
  • House stalls tougher lobbying rules; Veto, spanking ban advance... - My 9 91 3B
  • Thornburg to appeal pro-spanking ruling; Original law banned corporal punishment - My 25 91 3B
  • House to review bill on school punishment - Jn 7 91 3B
  • Charlotte officials sued over spanking - Jn 8 91 4B
  • School boards may get power to ban spanking - Jn 11 91 3B
  • Class exercise leads to change in law on spankings in schools - Jn 12 91 1
  • Classwork helps change law on school spankings - Jn 13 91 2B
  • Editorial: Free at last not to spank - Jn 17 91 6A
  • Senate panel endorses day-care spanking ban - Jy 4 91 3B
  • Senate backing ban on spanking - Jy 5 91 3B
  • Question about federal funds delays vote on spanking-bill ban - Jy 9 91 3B
  • Senate votes to enact day-care spanking ban - Jy 11 91 1B
  • New Hanover fires teacher over spankings - Jy 12 91 5B
  • Tar Heel editors speak: Paddling a lousy practice - Jy 21 91 7J
  • Triangle schools looking to make spanking extinct - Au 14 91 1
  • Spanking ban gets unanimous OK from Wake school board - Au 20 91 4B
  • Tar Heel editors speak: Spanking should be banned - Se 1 91 7J
  • More N.C. students being spared the rod; School spankings down 66 percent since 1984 - No 1 91 1
  • Abuse expert (Poussaint) denounces spanking - De 12 91 2B